Diversifying very strong backlinks with web 2.0 links for great ranking

metalfingersdoom · Feb 4, 2022

Hello everyone!

I’m currently trying to build backlinks to my website and have run into big issue. I have access to lots of websites belonging to the same organisation, all hidden behind cloudflare, and I'm pretty sure trying to rank my page exclusively through links on these pages will be a waste of time as google is quick to spot any signs of foul play (in my case the websites linking back to a single large organisation, and the 2 nameservers).

I have decided to diversify the backlinks by using web 2.0 websites, so they would not be coming from 2 nameservers or ips or organisations. The case is, these websites are basically places where people can create posts, and even though near all posts have strong text it's kind of spammy due to the fact that there are three to two hundred postings everyday most with backlinks, which seems very spammy.

I don't want to use typical web 2.0'ing (making a new blog and posting 10 contents, then linking to my page), as it is basically using fresh domains in a very short time which will make a lot of footprint. I don't think it'll work, but am open to suggestions.

I wonder if they will work at all for this purpose. I do not think I will be penalised for doing this, as I have seen numerous websites using these blogs with no repercussions, but am still paranoid regarding whether or not these will be enough to dilute the backlinks and get them to finally work. Maybe google will see through my shit. Does anyone have an idea?

metalfingersdoom · Feb 4, 2022

In case there is any ambiguity, the websites are not subdomains. They are dedicated domains mostly with the same layout, all clearly declaring their parent organisation in their front pages.

tiiberius · Feb 4, 2022

I suggest to do a mixture.

Start with these spammed ones. In the meantime build your own and let them age.

metalfingersdoom · Feb 4, 2022

tiiberius said:
I suggest to do a mixture.

Start with these spammed ones. In the meantime build your own and let them age.

So would you say the said backlinks will fully work once the diversification process has been complete? My though process was that as I added in more name servers to the mixture my backlink profile would no longer comprise solely of the 2 name server websites. However it's the fact that they link back to a single large organisation that gets me paranoid.

The organisations websites have autonomy - they are research journals - but if one third of my backlinks come from them, I suppose google will figure out that unless I'm the biggest thing in the world it would be unnatural. Am I right?

Can you point me towards somewhere on web 2.0 building? Do they have the same process as building pbns?

710fla · Feb 4, 2022

metalfingersdoom said:
So would you say the said backlinks will fully work once the diversification process has been complete? My though process was that as I added in more name servers to the mixture my backlink profile would no longer comprise solely of the 2 name server websites. However it's the fact that they link back to a single large organisation that gets me paranoid.

The organisations websites have autonomy - they are research journals - but if one third of my backlinks come from them, I suppose google will figure out that unless I'm the biggest thing in the world it would be unnatural. Am I right?

Can you point me towards somewhere on web 2.0 building? Do they have the same process as building pbns?

Good guide even though it’s a bit dated

https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/guide-the-art-of-super-web-2-0-creation.683979/

Bondpong007 · Feb 4, 2022

You shall go for the mix links as tier 1 then web2.0s for tier 2 and some blog comments over to get an link pyramid rankings !

metalfingersdoom · Feb 4, 2022

Bondpong007 said:
You shall go for the mix links as tier 1 then web2.0s for tier 2 and some blog comments over to get an link pyramid rankings !

So you propose to link web 2.0's I will set up to the spammy blogs posts I made on different websites, then to turn them into pyramids by linking tier3 comments to the tier2, am I right? The thing is I do not wish to use these posts for strengthening. I want to use them for diversification only. I'm a decent h4c ker and was planning on h4c king websites to strengthen my website. Would you say using pbns and web 2.0's are more effective than hacking? Because I want to be able to compare options.

My main question remains, lets not digress. Would you guys predict that the backlinks will work %100 percent after I'm done with diversification?

tiiberius · Feb 4, 2022

metalfingersdoom said:
I suppose google will figure out that unless I'm the biggest thing in the world it would be unnatural. Am I right?

That might be a problem.

Ideally you should keep everything separate.

Ashwanisingh48 · Aug 6, 2022

metalfingersdoom said:
Hello everyone!

I’m currently trying to build backlinks to my website and have run into big issue. I have access to lots of websites belonging to the same organisation, all hidden behind cloudflare, and I'm pretty sure trying to rank my page exclusively through links on these pages will be a waste of time as google is quick to spot any signs of foul play (in my case the websites linking back to a single large organisation, and the 2 nameservers).

I have decided to diversify the backlinks by using web 2.0 websites, so they would not be coming from 2 nameservers or ips or organisations. The case is, these websites are basically places where people can create posts, and even though near all posts have strong text it's kind of spammy due to the fact that there are three to two hundred postings everyday most with backlinks, which seems very spammy.

I don't want to use typical web 2.0'ing (making a new blog and posting 10 contents, then linking to my page), as it is basically using fresh domains in a very short time which will make a lot of footprint. I don't think it'll work, but am open to suggestions.

I wonder if they will work at all for this purpose. I do not think I will be penalised for doing this, as I have seen numerous websites using these blogs with no repercussions, but am still paranoid regarding whether or not these will be enough to dilute the backlinks and get them to finally work. Maybe google will see through my shit. Does anyone have an idea?

Are you on SKYPE?

blackbeans · Aug 10, 2022

The "weakness" you've identified with web 2.0 websites is built into those websites.

They are glorified user-generated content platforms.

It depends on the quality of the posts and how legit-looking your web 2.0 presence is.

Are you getting any links from elsewhere? Are you getting any social mentions?

My best advice is to post at least ten pieces of content but vary these, so maybe between 10 to 30 among different web 2.0 accounts.

Also, create social media accounts for your web 2.0 pages to look more legit.

Don't interlink with each other but link them to your site at different times with different keyword emphasis.

The bottom line is that your backlinks must look natural, and I agree with you that the first option is a non-starter.

Diversifying very strong backlinks with web 2.0 links for great ranking

metalfingersdoom

Junior Member

metalfingersdoom

Junior Member

tiiberius

Elite Member

metalfingersdoom

Junior Member

710fla

Elite Member

Bondpong007

BANNED

metalfingersdoom

Junior Member

tiiberius

Elite Member

Ashwanisingh48

Junior Member

blackbeans

Elite Member

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World