Here is the deal guys, I wanted a discussion on a topic I am getting back into. I want to either pump SAPE links or cheap PBN posts to a couple buffer sites for a new project. Unlike past projects I can not be as reckless with this domain as it is new. In the past I have: 1. Used SAPE -> Web 2.0 Buffer -> Money Site 2. Cheap PBN Posts -> Web 2.0 Buffer -> Money Site 3. SAPE -> 301 Domain -> Money Site 4. Cheap PBN Posts -> 301 Domain -> Money Site 5. Combination of PBN and SAPE -> 301 Domain -> Money Site 6. Cheap PBN -> URL Shortener -> Money Site 7. SAPE -> URL Shortener -> Money Site 8. Cheap PBN -> URL Shortener -> Web 2.0 Buffer -> Money Site 9. SAPE -> URL Shortener -> Web 2.0 Buffer -> Money Site Now, most of this I use for Churn and Burn, for this project I am mainly looking at SAPE or PBN to a Web 2.0 Buffer then to a Money Site. With other methods, while they work, I lose a good amount of link juice OR the money site eventually will get burned. I want to keep this as a long term project but want to rank quicker. As everyone should know, SAPE is quicker and more powerful, but the recurring payment is something I would like to avoid. So my question to those who have done both and are experienced, what is your preference? SAPE or cheap PBN posts when pointing at a Web 2.0 buffer? NOTE: The rest of the 'how I have done it in the past' is to help those who want to know how I do churn and burn projects. You can stop PMing me.