Did you notice this?

mojodoom

Registered Member
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
60
Reaction score
14
Do you know that if you watch in-stream non-skip ads for more than 30 seconds, the advertisers pay money for that.


In 2015, YouTube forcefully wanted viewers to watch 30 second non-skip video but now they have changed it to 5 seconds.

I upload videos on youtube that are instream ads friendly and run those videos on autopilot for 40 seconds with different IP to cash in money.

I have included pics to prove you.

It's a new trick, try it.
 
I don't know why the image is not getting uploaded
 
I find it hard to believe that someone hasn't tried this already, and that youtube doesn't have a system to notice this? It is like completing offers on oGADS with proxy if I understood good.

Btw how much they pay you per 1 add view
 
in-stream ads are high compare to other ads.
 
This sounds too good to be true. Can someone please confirm this?
 
Mojodoom , you better finish the earlier thread before starting a new thread, i feel something fishy here...no offense...
 
Last edited:
This only holds value if you get paid for it. Wait for your payout and post again if you don't get banned by Adsense 'til then
 
What's fishy in that?

The guy shared the method he posits that it is working. It was up to him to share it or not.
He did a good job and shared what he thinks might make you some money.

Now you go on and criticise the stuff and ask for the proof.
What the actual HELL. He just shared it and I bet he does not mind if you implement it or not. Go and test yourself ffs.

The idea seems quite decent to me, though.
 
OP, the picture you provided is a standard Youtube page, isn't it? What does it prove?
 
OP, the picture you provided is a standard Youtube page, isn't it? What does it prove?
It proves that the in-video ad can be skipped after 5 seconds, however, a user needs to watch it at least for 30 seconds for the uploader to get paid. pretty rephrase, ha?
 
YouTube didn't change anything. Advertisers can run their video ads with or without a skip button, obviously cost more without the button.
 
What's fishy in that?

The guy shared the method he posits that it is working. It was up to him to share it or not.
He did a good job and shared what he thinks might make you some money.

Now you go on and criticise the stuff and ask for the proof.
What the actual HELL. He just shared it and I bet he does not mind if you implement it or not. Go and test yourself ffs.

The idea seems quite decent to me, though.
Its not a new trick, its like clicking your adsense ads and expecting to get paid for it.
ofc people are gonna ask for proof when the method itself sounds crazy, we are talking about youtube(owned by fucking google) and not some start up advertising company.
 
i think this was old already. still watching your own ads is a little silly.
 
yes till payment released nothing is confirmed.
 
It proves that the in-video ad can be skipped after 5 seconds, however, a user needs to watch it at least for 30 seconds for the uploader to get paid. pretty rephrase, ha?

I was expecting there to be something more to the method. But thanks for clarifying.
 
Back
Top