I am currently studying business law, as far as i know an agreement can be oral as well in this case if they have a chat log that proves that OP agreed upon the terms then they can sue him.
Guys I'm sorry this is out of place, but I want a pizza.
It depends. If your leads were legit then yes you aren't responsible, but if they are fake or let's say "not that legit" you are(could be) commiting fraud, because you agreed to provide legit leads.good for me, I said I'm not responsable for cancelled leads
good for me, I said I'm not responsable for cancelled leads
so after he paid me I made the leads and now the company denied my leads and he said will sue me.
on topic
well, i guess how could they ordered your leads without testing lmfao. And why they didn't tell you to stop in between when they detected your leads are worthless/fake/false? They should have acted immediately and would have asked you return refund. if ya telling a true story then you can defend easily.
That sounds an awful lot like blaming the victim to me. "The victim should have figured out that he was being swindled earlier! They didn't, so they 'deserve' to lose their money!" Believe me, that line of reasoning is *not* going to hold any water in a civil or criminal court case. I as a plaintiff would be overjoyed to hear the defendant say something like "they should have stopped me when they learned the leads were fake"... it would certainly guarantee a settlement in my favor.