Hmm well I can understand your point here but I would have to somewhat disagree. I am ranking number 3 for "(city) lawyers" and this is off a site that I created just 3 weeks ago. The competition was decently stiff and all I did was create about 200 tier 1 links with tier 2 and 3 connected to them (and acquired some social media likes, shares, etc). Yes I agree that a business can be destroyed by spammy spun content, but if done correctly, this should never be the case. But who knows where my rankings will be in another 3 weeks. I guess experience truly is the best type of practice with seo.
You don't get it. You think SEO is backllinks.
This is precisely how to destroy someone's business., and opens you up to a lawsuit. You have a fiduciary responsibility to use accepted business practices in the pursuit of business.
If I tell you I will knock back the weeds in your yard, then go in there and spray toxic waste on the yard or use a flame thrower, you can sue me because that is not they accepted way to deal with weeds.
If I use a lawnmower and do it, even if you are unhappy, you cannot sue me.
Google has created a specific formula to level the playing field to allow local businesses to compete with all you spammers and the big boys.
They do this by establishing standard procedures to get a site accepted as a local business.
The way you are doing it is not the industry standard way of doing Local SEO.
You are not ranking a local site, you are ranking an IM site in a specific geographical area. Any local lawyer that comes along and does it right will toss you aside, and any algo change from G will gut your rankings.
Carve this into your brain.
Google has always, and always will, devalue any SEO method that attempts to gain an advantage by gaming the algo.
I submit the following:
When the web as young, you simply put your keywords into the keyword tag, and google knew what your site was about. You could get insane traffic by simply placing "naked girls" in your keyword tag. It worked so good, that everyone started spamming the fuck out of it.
So google decided to ignore it.
Next was link farms. These were sites full of links. Seriously, just page after page of links. But links was what was ranking so everyone jumped on board,and now link farms are considered bad neighborhoods and actually hurt you.
Want more?
Article directories used to be ALL IMers talked about, until all of the article directories except 4 or 5 had all their links devalued.
Forum profile links, next to useless even if they are related, useless and potentially harmful in not related today..
Press releases used to all be the rage, but now link from a press release website is of no value.
Blog posts, used to be any link was a good link, and a blog comment was gold, now they are zinc and the golds is contextual links in content. For now. As soon as that starts to tilt the rankings, it will get fixed.
Now, tell me where tiered link-building is right now. Is it affecting the rankings? If you believe it is, how log do you think before it gets hit?
The description used to be used to rank websites, it isn't anymore it just simply counts as content, when it used to be granted extra weight. Why?? Spammers started to game the system with it.
Already junk tiers are being devalued, and you even said to use quality. A year ago everyone said spin and spam was all you needed to do, quality was a joke. I actually got laughed at on this forum for suggesting that tier one sites be quality..
What happens when Google devalues all tiered links? What happens when someone runs a neg SEO campaign and you suddenly have thousands of more links?
Of course there must be something to use for ranking, so what could be begining to have influence now that did not traditionally help?
'
Social signals,perhaps? Google authorship? What happens when Google gets the algo adjusted to the point that it does not have to rely as heavily on links as it does now?
Will they continue to allow the quality of their SERPs to affected by this small corner of web users, or will they fix it like they historically have done?
You are not ranking your local site like google has said to do it.
To google, your site will look like an IM site, not a local business.
Local businesses behave like local businesses, not make money online sites.
They join associations related to their business and location. The advertise locally. They appear in local papers, they join the BBB, they sponsor little leagues and bowling leagues.
If you are a local business, all you have to do is act like one instead of acting like a spammer or scammer, and give the search engines what they want, not what you think they want.
This is why I stress that you need someone who understands LOCAL SEO. Almost no one does.