Cops Shoot Dead 107 Year Old Monroe Isadore

Its the old mans fault. He should've retreated and laid down so the cops could arrest. By shooting he turned what could've been a simple arrest and slap on the hand, into a war that caused his death. RIP

Half of you guys would side against the police officer, no matter the situation. Hating the "pig" seems to be the current fad, regardless of the fact they're risking their lives on a daily basis. Are there bad ones? Absolutely. It's that way in every career field. I like the "committing a mistake" comment. Really? I lol'd. The guy was putting other lives in danger. You know...lives of people who weren't going crazy with a dangerous weapon....

ceosam said:

Its the old mans fault. He should've retreated and laid down so the cops could arrest. By shooting he turned what could've been a simple arrest and slap on the hand, into a war that caused his death. RIP

Click to expand...

It's easy to analyze when you know nothing about the old man and his history. Did he suffer from Alzheimer or Dementia? Did he live in a bad neighborhood and had a history of break-ins? Could he hear or see the Officers? Was he in a wheelchair? Could he walk? Maybe he was mostly deaf and blind at his age. He was firing through a closed door according to the story which means he might not have known there were Officers out there. He might have thought he was protecting his home and in a fight for his life in his feeble mind.

Have you ever spent time around people in their 90s? The life cycle of humans is you start as a baby (needing someone to provide everything for you), mature to an adult and in your later years (if you live that long) is you return to the mentality and needs of a newborn.

The Officers should have, in fact, known they were dealing with the mentality of a child and acted as such. They could have waited this old guy out rather than escalating it quickly without knowing the full capacity of the person they were dealing with. One thing for sure, the 106 year old wasn't a threat to Society in his home and if the Officers had any sense and a bit of patience the old guy would most likely still be alive.

Doesn't matter it you are a 107 or three years old, if you have a gun you can kill.

talwin said:

Half of you guys would side against the police officer, no matter the situation. Hating the "pig" seems to be the current fad, regardless of the fact they're risking their lives on a daily basis. Are there bad ones? Absolutely. It's that way in every career field. I like the "committing a mistake" comment. Really? I lol'd. The guy was putting other lives in danger. You know...lives of people who weren't going crazy with a dangerous weapon....

Click to expand...

OMG, give the Officers risking their lives on a daily basis a fucking break. Officers are mostly report takers and citation writers. Rarely and I mean very rarely are their lives ever in danger. Here is some real information if you care to educate yourself about the risks of being a Police Officers. Average Citizen risk of homicide: 0.0054%. Police Officer's risk of homicide: 0.0058%

"So, do officers really put their "lives on the line everyday" to protect us? Dave Packman of Injustice Everywhere has calculated that in 2008 (the last year that complete data is available) the United State's Uniform Crime Reports Murder Rate was 5.4 per 100,000. The U.S's Uniform Crime Reports Felonious Homicide Rate for law enforcement officers was 5.76 per 100,000 in that same year. The chances that a law enforcement officer will become a victim of homicide were only slightly higher than the chances that a mere mundane would become a victim of homicide. Should this slight increase in probability be justification for law enforcement's proclivity for excessive force?"

Source: http://www.copblock.org/923/how-dangerous-is-police-work/

When you need the Police in seconds they're only minutes away. In simple terms they'll be there to notify your next-of-kin of your passing.

bertbaby said:

Doesn't matter it you are a 107 or three years old, if you have a gun you can kill.

Click to expand...

So shoot to kill if you see a 3 year old with a gun? I respect your opinion but it sounds extreme to have SWAT killing 3 year olds.

kvmcable said:

So shoot to kill if you see a 3 year old with a gun? I respect your opinion but it sounds extreme to have SWAT killing 3 year olds.

Click to expand...

This is like a textbook straw man fallacy.

Frankly I don't care about this argument, I just don't like fallacies.

Cratos said:

But someone trying to come into my home without my consent would get shot also. Survivors will be shot again.

Click to expand...

They had probable cause to enter the premise legally, your consent doesn't mean shit at that point.

And shooting at cops is a death sentence regardless.

kvmcable said:

OMG, give the Officers risking their lives on a daily basis a fucking break. Officers are mostly report takers and citation writers. Rarely and I mean very rarely are their lives ever in danger. Here is some real information if you care to educate yourself about the risks of being a Police Officers. Average Citizen risk of homicide: 0.0054%. Police Officer's risk of homicide: 0.0058%

"So, do officers really put their "lives on the line everyday" to protect us? Dave Packman of http://www.injusticeeverywhere.com has calculated that in 2008 (the last year that complete data is available) the United State's Uniform Crime Reports Murder Rate was 5.4 per 100,000. The U.S's Uniform Crime Reports Felonious Homicide Rate for law enforcement officers was 5.76 per 100,000 in that same year. The chances that a law enforcement officer will become a victim of homicide were only slightly higher than the chances that a mere mundane would become a victim of homicide. Should this slight increase in probability be justification for law enforcement's proclivity for excessive force?"

Source: http://www.copblock.org/923/how-dangerous-is-police-work/

When you need the Police in seconds they're only minutes away. In simple terms they'll be there to notify your next-of-kin of your passing.

Click to expand...

You have to be kidding me. Every time a police officer approaches a deadly situation, on purpose I might add, he risks losing his life. An officer here was shot to death, along with his dog, because he was far too lenient in a situation. Great guy, my kids loved him, but he would more than likely be alive right now if he would have been a bit quicker to use his weapon. You should be ashamed of yourself. I bet if really needed them, you wouldn't hesitate to call.

kvmcable said:

So shoot to kill if you see a 3 year old with a gun? I respect your opinion but it sounds extreme to have SWAT killing 3 year olds.

Click to expand...

Point was age doesn't matter with guns, the shooter can kill you. Also, I learned a long time ago not to get in confrontations with men who are allowed by law to carry guns and use them if provoked. Yep, I got into argument with a guard once and had four squad cars surround me within five minutes. I was nineteen at the time and I was lucky just to get a summons so I learned my lesson. If you are a 107 you should have learned that lesson as well but then again he could have been suffering from senile dementia.

I wonder what that closet racist guy has to say about this...

"Something, something, something, Travvon Martin."

Sad

The old man sounds like he lost his marbles. Its common for seniors to lose their marbles as age sets in. Sounds like he should have been in a nursing home or a home for the elderly.

IF any of his children are alive---they would also be Seniors---in their 70's and 80's. Wow....imagine that!

kvmcable said:

Born in 1906, survived a ton of shit this world has been through since that time. He would have been 27 when the Great Depression rocked this Country. He would have been 35 when Pearl Harbor was bombed entering the USA into WWII. It would be hard to imagine the changes he's seen in his lifetime, the knowledge and wisdom he would undoubtedly have.

With the number of non-lethal methods Officers have today you wonder why deadly force was used. I'm not accusing them if they were really protecting themselves but plenty of videos have proven an Officer's word isn't always correct.

The world lost a valuable source of history. I would have loved to have a beer with this guy before he passed. I imagine he had a ton of stories to share. History you'll never read in books.

Click to expand...

All I'm gonna say is, stupid people get old too...

Caught on Camera: Texas cop charged for beating the whole family because the son was speeding

A Texas officer has been caught on camera beating up several members of a family. According to KHOU.com, Harris County Deputy Jimmy Drummond followed the son home for allegedly speeding, then attacked members of his family when they approached him. The altercation was recorded on a dash cam.

According to KHOU, the officer, who's due in court on Friday, broke the son's ribs, bruised his father's face, and dragged his mother.

Watch video of the attack below:

http://www.sott.net/article/266242-...the-whole-family-because-the-son-was-speeding

I liked this comment on that page the most.

He's 107 years old and NO hostages . How long would you have to wait for him to fall asleep?

I don't if I am the only guy here, but recently I have started hating the fucking cops. Writing tickets for bullshit reasons while you are not in the car, pulling you over while with girlfriend... cheap corrupted cocksucker bastards, not all of them, but most!

"the revolution will be televised"