umerjutt00
Elite Member
- Oct 28, 2011
- 4,373
- 2,493
Well I couldn't even understand what that "Cross Platform Transparency" thing is? From what I understood, its a way to connect websites with their social media presence. Maybe a new ranking factor?
[Coming Soon] Google Peacock Update
- Thread starter Scritty
- Start date
D
Deleted member 657006
Guest
That is it , but from every possible way to get stats to index possition.
Work like this .
Indexed Website nick
Twitter for nick , traffic looked 4 min and watched 1 video 3 min.
Instagram for nick , traffic read a article 5 min .
Tumblr for nick , traffic watch small video 10 min.
So all stats will be added up to help position your website .
Of course there be other hidden stats and meanings ...
It makes complete scence to me socail been around long now, it a excuse for google to take action with them stats for seo anyway .
Last edited by a moderator:
beverlyswanigan
Newbie
- Oct 13, 2018
- 11
- 0
Actually, I am confused????
D
Deleted member 657006
Guest
The whole concept makes full sense .
That means that the Google tool kit when submitting your domain will also need your social website info ...
Guessing
It means all social websites you joined that are part of your website linked ,
stats will be used to postion your index postion in google .
Like my example above , if your socail websites are very active the more stat points the better the indexing poistion .
Of course there be many stats involved .
That means seo will be cross platform to get indexed heigh.
Clever fuckers google really .
Last edited by a moderator:
Sund97
Regular Member
- Dec 7, 2018
- 323
- 110
Not gonna happen that its gonna be manually placed. Because then most people will move to bing over time cause they know its manipulated by google them self. Which i think will be against alot of laws in alot of countries aswell. This is already happening on stuff like Politics. But it won't happen to everything else never ever in my life i would believe that
D
Deleted member 657006
Guest
Ok ...
But them using social stats from all over for index positioning must be true!
Makes scence
magicjones
Power Member
- Oct 10, 2018
- 608
- 367
Tinfoil hat time lol
if this is confirmed it will be the end of google as the knower, like yahoo in his time. Google win the war thanks to the consideration of backlinks, but it is not said that he won for the 30 years that arrive
Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
It is a bit doom and gloom.
As someone who has been in this game since the mid 90's this feels like several other upheavals (if it happens in the way I think)
When links first became a "thing" in the early 2000's the story was "Well that's the end of SEO, you'll never get other websites to give you links"
Oh yes SEO existed before links were a factor and Alta Vista and Yahoo were the search engines to climb.
Websites back then were hard work. No WordPress. Everything had to be FTP'd and every page created in terrible software or on the fly in raw HTML.
There were no comments sections on blogs, and writing a new page was the easy bit. Uploading it so it looked ok took ages.
There was no such things as "themes". You wanted a website? You designed it - from scratch, in HTML or using Dreamweaver or some such clunky software.
Getting someone to put a link on their site was hard work. They basically had to write new content, add it to the page index, FTP it up at pre broadband (3.6 kilobytes a second typically KILOBYTES - not MEGABYTES)
No one was going to give you a link.
But we got round it. WEB2.0 came, new ideas were found, and for those of us who stuck at it was actually a golden age. Because so many people quit. If you were one of the first to get a handle on the new paradigm you had a blank slate, a second chance.
This will be the same.
The amount of money made via the internet is only going to go up. As SEO's we can adapt and change. Find a way and take advantage of quitters leaving the market a little more open for us.
Of course we need to find out what is happening in detail first, and we have no real idea as yet.
But when it happens, the best of you will suddenly see new opportunities and a clearer playing field - and get a win.
Because that's what always happens.
As someone who has been in this game since the mid 90's this feels like several other upheavals (if it happens in the way I think)
When links first became a "thing" in the early 2000's the story was "Well that's the end of SEO, you'll never get other websites to give you links"
Oh yes SEO existed before links were a factor and Alta Vista and Yahoo were the search engines to climb.
Websites back then were hard work. No WordPress. Everything had to be FTP'd and every page created in terrible software or on the fly in raw HTML.
There were no comments sections on blogs, and writing a new page was the easy bit. Uploading it so it looked ok took ages.
There was no such things as "themes". You wanted a website? You designed it - from scratch, in HTML or using Dreamweaver or some such clunky software.
Getting someone to put a link on their site was hard work. They basically had to write new content, add it to the page index, FTP it up at pre broadband (3.6 kilobytes a second typically KILOBYTES - not MEGABYTES)
No one was going to give you a link.
But we got round it. WEB2.0 came, new ideas were found, and for those of us who stuck at it was actually a golden age. Because so many people quit. If you were one of the first to get a handle on the new paradigm you had a blank slate, a second chance.
This will be the same.
The amount of money made via the internet is only going to go up. As SEO's we can adapt and change. Find a way and take advantage of quitters leaving the market a little more open for us.
Of course we need to find out what is happening in detail first, and we have no real idea as yet.
But when it happens, the best of you will suddenly see new opportunities and a clearer playing field - and get a win.
Because that's what always happens.
pressrelease
BANNED
- Jan 6, 2016
- 946
- 461
I dont if its a troll post or what.
Scritty
Elite Member
- May 1, 2010
- 3,019
- 4,707
If you look at my reply on page one (near the bottom) a link to the Rand report is there.
The Rand report is one of several commissioned reports on the way the government perceives the web is being mis-used and it recommends that at the top level, someone with authority should be able to see a network of interacting entities.
So the Russian bot thing was supposed to be multiple profiles and websites all at once. At the moment each one has to be queried. The governments have to politely ask each social media company and each host and each search engine if they can follow the trail. See who opened the accounts, check the credit card details.
They want the power to see it all. At a glance.
Which means at the top level - data sharing between (for example) Google, Facebook, Twitter and web host providers.
It's also to keep an eye on e-currency which many governments see both as a threat to their own fiscal controls, and an opportunity to levy taxes if they can get a handle on it.
These happen all over the place, and at the moment it's nearly impossible to audit trace buying and selling through the blockchain.
So evading sales taxes (by using ecurrency rather than cash), and they will also claim funding terrorism and all that kind of stuff.
These reports suggest (all of the reports, not just the Rand report) that ISP's web hosts, social platforms and search engines need a lot more cross platform co-operation at the top level to make governments life's a lot easier. So (for example) a government agency just has to ask one question once - They don't need to ask everyone and then spend days or weeks "joining the dots" they just ask once, and a whole cross platform network is revealed
So you have a website, that has a Facebook profile, that uses Twitter for advertising as well as having a presence on some forums.
They use Youtube and Vimeo to video advertise and they outreach and brand build on blogs and discussion sites like Redditt
They buy and sell using (for example) Etherium
The government wants to levy tax, make sure they aren't doing anything illegal. (Like funding terrorism)
Currently they have to ask each network one at a time, follow the links, look at the traffic flow. Collate tons of data.
What they want to be able to do is see it all in some cockpit view form at the press of a button.
For that to work even at a basic level all these platforms need to start information sharing.
These reports recommend to governments across the world that they INSIST that these platforms share data with each other, and the governments themselves to make tracing people, currency and any attempt to mess with elections etc - all much more easily visible.
- Dec 13, 2010
- 4,875
- 3,316
Sound hell like conspiration theories.
I see some problems in your narrative:
- Government & GAFA aren't friend. On the contrary, those companies wants to keep their data for themselves, at all price.
- Europe just passed GDPR law. The trail a user used to make between social medias got erased.
Based on those 2 single points, I dont see how a government would access data of those big companies and link them together.
I see some problems in your narrative:
- Government & GAFA aren't friend. On the contrary, those companies wants to keep their data for themselves, at all price.
- Europe just passed GDPR law. The trail a user used to make between social medias got erased.
Based on those 2 single points, I dont see how a government would access data of those big companies and link them together.
blackbeans
Elite Member
- Nov 29, 2008
- 9,247
- 4,807
I wonder how much MACHINE LEARNING will be involved in this
