Cheap cloaking service
- Thread starter virapon
- Start date
- Jun 20, 2013
- 11,507
- 8,915
Cheap cloaking service doesn't work, they will get your advertiser account ban again and again. You need to spend $$$ to try your luck in cloaking.
Kennyraban
Registered Member
- Jul 11, 2017
- 76
- 11
Learning...
Lucky Sharma
BANNED
- Jun 5, 2017
- 9
- 0
Use starcampaigns xyz I have been using it since last 6 months. Its free of cost.
EagerToEarn
Regular Member
- Jun 4, 2017
- 380
- 100
It would be nice if someone experienced give answer. Maybe advertsafe?
Harnur
Regular Member
- Jan 4, 2017
- 450
- 1,005
Can you share the link of it?
- Mar 21, 2013
- 24,764
- 31,554
Cloaking requires updated databases and to be ahead of the pack 24x7 otherwise the cloaker won't work as you want it. That's why there aren't good and cheap cloakers.
Syrus Enriquez
Regular Member
- Jan 9, 2017
- 436
- 29
starcampaigns xyz
Golden house
Newbie
- May 17, 2017
- 10
- 0
Its about good service of bad service good service doesnt come for free or cheap you need to decide where you want to go in this manner.
lafj13
Newbie
- Jun 30, 2017
- 27
- 4
Is it working for Adwords?
Harnur
Regular Member
- Jan 4, 2017
- 450
- 1,005
Yes, it does. I personally talked to the website owner thru skype. BUT, he says since it's a new startup, they have "small number of bots ip logs". So, there are chances of getting banned. So, you if you have money to spend, go for fraudfilter/JCI.
nicktheShinobi
Junior Member
- Mar 10, 2016
- 120
- 28
Each traffic source requires cloaking in a different way. For the sake of your accounts and your money, you want to get a solid cloaker for your traffic source.
Google cloaking has to be set up in a different way then native ads cloaking for example. Where on native you may have different rules set up in cloaker vs cloaking on google vs cloaking on FB.
Google and FB are the toughest as they are quite strict and regardless of how well you cloak, your accounts will still get banned although there are neat tricks to help minimize it.
I would not go the cheap route, you want a good cloaker that has the features that you need to bypass the sophisticated bots from the top tier traffic sources if thats where you plan to run.
Google cloaking has to be set up in a different way then native ads cloaking for example. Where on native you may have different rules set up in cloaker vs cloaking on google vs cloaking on FB.
Google and FB are the toughest as they are quite strict and regardless of how well you cloak, your accounts will still get banned although there are neat tricks to help minimize it.
I would not go the cheap route, you want a good cloaker that has the features that you need to bypass the sophisticated bots from the top tier traffic sources if thats where you plan to run.
Harnur
Regular Member
- Jan 4, 2017
- 450
- 1,005
Which traffic source do you cloak with starcampaigns? It doesn't seem to work for Google Adwords.
- Mar 21, 2013
- 24,764
- 31,554
For Adwords and FB if you use a cheap cloaker you will end up losing your account.
Harnur
Regular Member
- Jan 4, 2017
- 450
- 1,005
which one do you use?
- Nov 6, 2016
- 440
- 235
if its cheap, you are risking your accounts, it takes a lot to keep Database updated.
Good Luck
Good Luck
Rank Panda
BANNED
- Jan 15, 2017
- 435
- 107
i think fraudfilter good, it's cheap.
Rank Panda
BANNED
- Jan 15, 2017
- 435
- 107
lol, not good.