It did, but with C. And it actually failed on most of "critical thinking" questions. Full research.
ChatGPT killed Stackoverflow
- Thread starter nuclearrap
- Start date
- Feb 22, 2022
- 388
- 236
"The bot's score, Terwiesch wrote, shows its "remarkable ability to automate some of the skills of highly compensated knowledge workers in general and specifically the knowledge workers in the jobs held by MBA graduates including analysts, managers, and consultants"
I think we have conflicting information.
nuclearrap
Power Member
- Apr 19, 2011
- 588
- 1,922
If AI is such a useless thing, why professors talk about it is taking over jobs, for the last 10 years on the TV?
nuclearrap
Power Member
- Apr 19, 2011
- 588
- 1,922
I wish they didn't give it SOCOM to kill us all.
Vikjohn
Regular Member
- May 10, 2016
- 433
- 214
I heard chatgpt is also trained with Wikipedia, it's possible it knows the whole of Wikipedia, but chatgpt data isn't upto to date though
nuclearrap
Power Member
- Apr 19, 2011
- 588
- 1,922
I have made a million dollars with my projects and it can write all the codes that I can write already, it was able to fix all the bugs for me, it even gave me a hundred more ideas. I am not the best engineer in the world, but you have to accept this reality: these things will surpass us all eventually.
Ashk881
Elite Member
- Aug 24, 2021
- 1,695
- 2,072
I didn't call it useless. All I said is it's not as skilled as a human and we don't know if it ever can be.
Sociology Professors talk about it because AI singularity is in some realm of possibility. We don't know how it will happen or if it will ever happen at all, Y'all are what I call AI jingoists. As if these bots taking your job will help you in any way
nuclearrap
Power Member
- Apr 19, 2011
- 588
- 1,922
Sociology? But Computer Science professors say the same thing too. I follow them all.I didn't call it useless. All I said is it's not as skilled as a human and we don't know if it ever can be.
Sociology Professors talk about it because AI singularity is in some realm of possibility. We don't know how it will happen or if it will ever happen at all, Y'all are what I call AI jingoists. As if these bots taking your job will help you in any way
I wouldn't want AI to take my job, but it took my job already, but "no one" is aware of it yet. Shh don't tell anyone!
kadirilgin1453
Newbie
- Mar 19, 2022
- 39
- 16
No matter how good ChatGPT is. it will never replace a human being. Because it has no soul. It never will. You are so right about Stackoverflow. People there are ruthless.
clickwinks
Regular Member
- Jan 4, 2021
- 460
- 107
I still fell ChatGPT will not end Good skilled writers, If there is no original content how can AI think? AI is just grabbing data and giving your answers. If all ask same questions to ChatGpt then duplicate content rises and this will end the chatGPT faith as well.
VimalG
Registered Member
- Jul 24, 2021
- 81
- 65
OpenAI has developed Whisper which can transcribe everything any human has said ever in any language. Take a second to process that. It doesn't need writers to write anything, it just needs data of any kind...
Evolving
Newbie
- Jan 9, 2023
- 30
- 9
Not sure...but it appears that chatgpt is directing a lot of traffic to Wikipedia...
iEscapedTheMatrix
Junior Member
- Oct 11, 2022
- 170
- 337
Well, they actually kind of killed themselves because Wikipedia collaborated with ChatGPT to provide mass data. Once ChatGPT can stay up to date, it will be able to pull whatever info from Wikipedia that you want it to. Wikipedia understands its business isn't future-proof in every way, so it had to improvise and find a way to stay in the game.
Dalene Morovic
Registered Member
- Aug 24, 2019
- 99
- 102
Well, it seems that ChatGPT has become so good at answering questions that people are turning to it instead of Stackoverflow. That's right, instead of searching for the answer on the popular Q&A site, people are asking ChatGPT directly.
And who can blame them? ChatGPT is always available, doesn't require you to sift through pages of search results, and can give you an answer in seconds. It's like having a personal Stackoverflow right at your fingertips.
But what does this mean for Stackoverflow? Well, some people are worried that it may become obsolete. After all, if people are no longer using the site to find answers, then what's the point of it?
On the other hand, there are those who believe that ChatGPT and Stackoverflow can coexist. They argue that while ChatGPT may be great at providing quick answers, it can't replace the depth and expertise of the Stackoverflow community.
And who can blame them? ChatGPT is always available, doesn't require you to sift through pages of search results, and can give you an answer in seconds. It's like having a personal Stackoverflow right at your fingertips.
But what does this mean for Stackoverflow? Well, some people are worried that it may become obsolete. After all, if people are no longer using the site to find answers, then what's the point of it?
On the other hand, there are those who believe that ChatGPT and Stackoverflow can coexist. They argue that while ChatGPT may be great at providing quick answers, it can't replace the depth and expertise of the Stackoverflow community.
Darthfurby
Registered Member
- Sep 16, 2022
- 81
- 73
ChatGPT Passes Google Coding Interview for Level 3 Engineer With $183K Salary:
https://www.pcmag.com/news/chatgpt-...terview-for-level-3-engineer-with-183k-salary
https://www.pcmag.com/news/chatgpt-...terview-for-level-3-engineer-with-183k-salary