Can you rank without off-page SEO ?

These guys have your answer :)

Google consider three important factors while ranking any web-page in a search result.

Relevancy -How relevant is web-page / website to the keywords query of the visitor?

Authority - What is the authority of the web-page / website over the web?

User Experience – How easily visitors can access the web-page / website?

So without earning good authority it’s bit difficult rank higher a website in search result but not impossible. Still you can rank in Google for long-tail keywords. Specially these days people start using long-tail keywords while searching in Google.

So if your website is relevant and providing good user experience then you can easily rank higher in search result. Suppose if you are providing valuable content that visitors want to read then automatically you will earn lots of link because everyone loves to out-link the good & valuable content.

3 important factors -

Authority = quality and relevant backlinks + links from Google seed sites (.gov, .edu, .org, news websites)

Relevancy = valuable & relevant content + optimized meta tags + optimized Images with alt text + proper internal-linking + proper technical seo(canonicalization, robots.txt, xml sitemap+ 301 redirection)

User Experience = optimized load time (Mobile Speed) + responsive website + easy to navigate + custom 404 page

Don't listen to that joker who said ranking with on-page SEO is impossible and "dangerous" (Seriously? Dangerous?). Several members, including myself, have done it, although doing only on-page SEO does come with its own set of problems. For example, if one of your competitors notices that you're not building backlinks, they may try to take advantage of this and outrank you (rather easily) with backlinks. Then there's the issue with the lack of low competition keywords in certain niches. As an example of that, one of my clients has a local business in a niche where there are very few low competition keywords, especially since I had to use city name keywords.

I can go on and on about the pros and cons of ranking a site without any off-page SEO, but it's just something that you're going to have to look into and determine whether or not it's worth the time and effort.
 
Exactly! It is a classy better be safe than sorry scenario!

The only "danger" I see with not having off-page SEO is that someone can blast your site with a billion dirty links and screw you up.

You do need some link reputation in order to be safe from this kind of sabotage.
 
Anyone who considers this dangerous is on drugs.

It's the safest form of SEO that you can basically do. There was a great thread about this in journey section, where guy targeted long tail KWs with 0 - 10 search volume according to google and was pulling some decent money, considering he hasn't built a single link. Choose a main niche and target every single keyword out of it regardless of search volume. Build 100 - 300 pages, let it age and you will see it getting more and more traffic after cca 9 months. Then a few well placed guest posts will push it even higher.

Bottom line. If you have a good and cheap writer, then you have already won. You will rank for hundreds of long tails that you don't even have any idea about and the traffic will come. Not to mention the price of the domain, if you decide to flip it, will be higher, due to none or minimal offsite SEO and smaller risks associated with it.
 
Good luck ranking for any worthy keywords that actually brings tons of cash, with on-page alone.
 
Good luck ranking for any worthy keywords that actually brings tons of cash, with on-page alone.

Why bother ranking for one heavy keyword, when you can rank for hundreds of its longtails, which will bring X times more traffic? And you will rank for the fraction of the cost. This is a common technique, which involves less risks, but requires more patience. Easily done and unless some neg-SEO lowlife decides to screw you over, you are as safe as you can possibly be. Depends on the point of view. For long term stuff it's perfect.
 
If the KC is under 15, I believe only on page seo and some social signals can ensure your ranking.
 
Yupp, the man is right! You do not want to fall in for such scenario as you will be forced to work on reverse SEO stratesgies to get back on track,meanwhile your competitiors would be ruling the SERP.

Now, how did I fail to notice this post :)

The only "danger" I see with not having off-page SEO is that someone can blast your site with a billion dirty links and screw you up.

You do need some link reputation in order to be safe from this kind of sabotage.
 
I would differ from what max seo experts think. For my clients I have ranked their sites with just a handful of links and that too in competitive niches like gaming, business marketing.
 
You can try it out but I'm sure it will take a long time, than when building links to it.
 
The reality is that if a keyword is profitable, there will be other sites competing for the same traffic. Maybe you could make $40 or $50 with a site that has low competition, but for anything halfway decent you're going to need to build links and use off-page SEO.
 
You can get to the top for low and mid-competitive keywords with on-page tactics only, still I would agree that you`ll be at risk to be outranked easily, especially if you are targeting local seo and use the locations in your keyword phrases. I once got a client`s website to the page 1 by only optimizing the pages and improving the website structure (back then we`ve also concentrated a lot on the mobile version performance), however, after some thoughtful competitors` link-building I almost got to where I`ve started.

Some say link-building is close to dead, but from what I see - Google wouldn`t issue the updates like Penguin or manual penalties to prevent the manipulation over PR if the links wouldn`t matter anymore. Surely, on-page and technical improvements, UX and even social shares are among the top ranking factors to aim for, still the backlink profile seems to be an important ingredient in that cocktail to preserve the positions you gain.
 
Low competitive keywords can be ranked without backlinks. I have done it with our websites. If the competition is moderate or high, no way but to build links to push your keywords forward
 
The only "danger" I see with not having off-page SEO is that someone can blast your site with a billion dirty links and screw you up.

You do need some link reputation in order to be safe from this kind of sabotage.

Thank you! I always wondered why not everyone does this to their competition. So having backlinks makes you safe(r) from those kinds of attacks. Should be in every SEO 101 article. One of the best arguments for Off-Page SEO, especially important in high competitive blackhat niches like adult or gambling niche.
 
Its happening in the rank but off page would make it quick and solid. Build the links without fail.
 
Thank you! I always wondered why not everyone does this to their competition. So having backlinks makes you safe(r) from those kinds of attacks. Should be in every SEO 101 article. One of the best arguments for Off-Page SEO, especially important in high competitive blackhat niches like adult or gambling niche.

SEO 101 articles are copypasta from the Google webmasters blog. They don't reveal anything really effective, just the obvious common sense stuff.
 
Yes, you can rank without off-page SEO, but your staying power will be limited, because off-page SEO provides trustRank and you need to have a trust relationship to maintain high rankings.
 
Back
Top