can negative seo still harm competitors effectively?

Grayson Vale

Grayson Vale

Registered Member
Joined
Jun 1, 2026
Messages
52
Reaction score
29
I have been seeing mixed opinions about negative SEO lately. some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.

what's your experience does negative SEO still pose a real thread today
 
Last edited:
Advertise on BHW
Someone who is dedicated can still cause harm.

Instead of a direct spam to your main site, they can use any backlink analytics tools like SEMrush/Ahrefs and weed out all your niche edits and guest posts and either contact the owners of those sites or do a spam attack on those links, meaning the owners of those sites will pull the entire article, including your links, especially if they are being threatened.

Then you are out of your money and links.

Not giving you any more ideas, but it does work.
 
Google has become much better at filtering out spammy and low quality backlinks, so they usually don't have much impact on rankings. That said, negative SEO can still be a concern if it's done on a large scale, especially for newer or smaller websites. Keeping an eye on your backlink profile and consistently earning high quality links is still the best way to protect your site.
 
Google had become much better at ignoring a lot of low quality signals than it was years ago. I would not rely on negative SEO having a consistent effect. In most cases spending time improving your own site has produced much more reliable results than worrying about what competitors might do.
 
Google is better at ignoring most spam links now I think real SEO focus matters more than worrying about negative SEO
 
In my experience, it's much less effective than it used to be

Googles algorithms have improved at ignoring many spammy or low-quality backlinks so simple backlink spam alone usually doesn't have much impact That said no site is completely immun especially if it already has technical or security issues I think it's better to focus on building a strong healthy SEO profile rather than worrying too much about negative SEO
 
in my opinion people often blame negative SEO when the real issue is an algorithm update or technical problem i'd focus more on strengthening my own site than worrying about spam links from competitors
 
Most times, Google simply ignores these spammy links now, and therefore, negative SEO does not affect rankings anymore. The only scenario where this might actually make any difference is if the negative SEO is massive, and it works alonside a weak unnatural link profile
 
Google has become much better at ignoring most spammy backlinks .However If negative SEO is done on a large scale or involves more than just bad links , It can still issues. Regularly monitoring your backlink profile and overall site health isl always a good pratice
 
long-term SEO success comes from quality content and trusted link profiles rather than trying to influence competitors. what i believe is focusing on building strong, relevant and natural backlinks is more effective than worrying about negative practices.
 
from what I have seen google mostly ignores spammy links now so negative SEO alone usually doesn't hurt much unless the site already has other issues still if someone blasts a huge amount of bad links it can cause temporary fluctuations but in most cases recovery happens once things stabilize.
 
The direct spam attack is a really serious issue, But you don't worry about some unwanted links pointing to your money site, Google now more concentrate for the behavioural pattern. so it won't create any issue.

But if somebody pointing to create negative campaigns for your site, you must take some precautionary actions to prevent your site.
 
Grayson Vale said:
I have been seeing mixed opinions about negative SEO lately. some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.

what's your experience does negative SEO still pose a real thread today
Click to expand...
LLMs take anything what’s written about a brand into account. So what you can do is write false reviews with false accusations on different websites and this will get picked up by every LLM. The more positive context exist the more you have to create to counter this.
 
in my experience google does a better job of filtering spam links than it used to most established sites with a natural backlink profile don't seem to be affected by random toxic links
 
I still think its not completely harmless if someone is doing it at scale. In some cases Itcan trigger weird fluctuations or make thing messy enough that you still need to keep an eye on your backlink profile.
 
Grayson Vale said:
some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.
Click to expand...
No, google doesn't ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks it don't allow them. Yes, it still cause ranking dropdown if you choose the spammy or negative comment. Negative seo still works but not like that it works before.
 
I am still learning, but it feels like people worry about negative seo more than they probably need to.I would focus on building a strong site first and keep an eye on backlinks now and then.
 
In most cases Google ignores spammy backlinks but if a large scale attack happens it's still a good idea to monitor your backlink profile and remove or disavow harmful links when needed.
 
Grayson Vale said:
I have been seeing mixed opinions about negative SEO lately. some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.

what's your experience does negative SEO still pose a real thread today
Click to expand...
In my experience, Google is far better at ignnoring spammy backlinks now. negative SEO can still be a concern in extreme cases, but for most sites, focusing on quality content, strong backlinks and regular backlink monitoring is far more important.
 
Grayson Vale said:
I have been seeing mixed opinions about negative SEO lately. some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.

what's your experience does negative SEO still pose a real thread today
Click to expand...
spam backlink do not have as much influence today. they only damage the website performance in case of any isues within its content or link structure.
 
Advertise on BHW
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top