@Kimray articles on Wikipedia likely to be deleted unless they meet certain thresholds of "notability." It is very hard to get around these thresholds without legitimate notability.
What is AfC and AfD?Agreed. Survival of an AfD is very tricky. I have seen pages created and approved by AfC been deleted in an AfD. Admittedly most people don't second guess what an AfC reviewer thinks so those articles rarely get nominated. It's very easy to slip fake citations by AfC reviewers.
Different languages have entirely different requirements and standards. Your client might not meet DE notability standards. It may also be a translation issue that makes the article seem overly commercial. Are you using a human or machine translator?Also need help for this:
got a big client that has a page for EN, PT and FR (these last two are translations of the EN page). For some reason, when I try to translate for other languages (let's say DE, for example) the page get's marked for deletion. Do I need to use relevant references from the country/language I'm trying to write for?
really don't get it how the pages are marked for deletion for supposedly being too commercial (they're not) when they're translations of other already approved pages
Due to abuse definately the article won't be lasting before being flagged. I always wonder where the unrelenting motivation comes from. Try and edit a famous person's page and see.First of all Create Account on Wikipedia than you will get panel where you can upload your data and customize also.
Be aware that many of the publications that we consider reputable aren't so by Wikipedia. Interviews don't work, the journo has to do their own research. Some major national UK newspapers (2 of the biggest) don't qualify. None of the 'new' social proof publications like Famous Birthdays work.Then a notability service should be the precursor service. Someone to publish articles in respectable news outlets. If there is such a service here for press release I would be glad to be pointed to.
The cost of the service should be justified by the difficult hurdles I can see.Be aware that many of the publications that we consider reputable aren't so by Wikipedia. Interviews don't work, the journo has to do their own research. Some major national UK newspapers (2 of the biggest) don't qualify. None of the 'new' social proof publications like Famous Birthdays work.
You need strong, expensive press and to make sure the page is written in a way the admins like. Most Wikipedia editors are very aware of the fact you can buy PR placements.