here's some stuff to consider about old domains & whether they do or don't pass age off-site via 301's
lets look at a domain like tinyurls.com
domaintools says: domain registration created on 27-Jan-2002.
A 10yr old site like tinyurls.com would be classed a old domain, so it should have more power then a "aged" domain
if you check the redirect with live http headers its a 301
on the basis of bobby's "method", tinyurls & sites like that, will give your SERPS a turbo boost because its "aged" and you can 301 links at a new target. its easy and free for anyone to A/B split test this.
bit.ly is another domain that you would called "aged" and you get true 301...why arn't ppl talking about the bit.ly SEO boost? surely after millions of people using the service someones smart enought to spot the aged domain 301 super powers?
obviously, a 301 isn't going to do any harm, but you got to be smoking some good shit to think its going to bump you up in the SERPS.
any success ppl report, is just because of the blog farm links...and just like if you used a bit.ly for the ANL blast, it dosn't help or hurt. yeah, blog farm links work great, thats been no secret for donkey years...and in other news, yes, the sky is blue.
something else to consider, are the 301's created by 10,000's of people a day on sites like tinyurl/bit.ly "indexed" before they are used for redirects?
no, they're not, it dosn't matter. So all this stuff he's preaching about comment spamming to index & then pointing at your money site is useless, and as ppl have report already, it will do more harm then good.