Best format for FB video ads in 2025?

Vertical 9:16 videos are king now, especially for e-com. They grab attention better on mobile and convert more than square videos. Keep it short, punchy, and mobile-friendly. That’s where you’ll see the best results.
 
Are square videos still king or have vertical 9:16 ads taken over? I’m about to relaunch a campaign for e-com products and want to know what converts best these days.
I still run square ads and still find it effective.
 
You need both
9:16 and 16:9, both are useful and required for some platforms
But in general 9:16 are the most useful and popular
 
Vertical 9:16 ads have definitely taken over, especially on mobile placements like Reels and Stories. They feel more native and consistently outperform square videos in CTR and conversion rates now.
 
Vertical 9:16 ads have taken over. They perform way better across FB, IG, and TikTok — full-screen = higher CTR and engagement.
 
Vertical 9:16 is performing best in 2025 since most users browse on mobile. Square can still work, but vertical fills the screen, feels native to Reels and Stories, and usually drives higher CTR
 
I find that vertical video (9:16) is dominating right now because it’s optimized for Reels and stories—where conversion rates are highest right now. For best results, use 9:16 for stories/reels and 4:5/1:1 for news feed, and always use captions.
 
I see that 9:16 vertical videos are being used more, especially on Reels and Stories, but I still wonder if the conversion rate is really higher than square videos.
 
Vertical 9:16 is definitely ruling now — it feels more native across Reels, Stories, and Shorts. I used to run square too, but after switching to vertical, CTR and watch time jumped noticeably.
 
Are square videos still king or have vertical 9:16 ads taken over? I’m about to relaunch a campaign for e-com products and want to know what converts best these days.
Vertical 9:16 performs better now since it fits Reels and Stories. Square can still work, but vertical gets higher watch time and reach.
 
Vertical 9:16 is performing better lately, especially for mobile traffic and Reels placements. Square still works fine for mixed placements, but vertical tends to get higher engagement and watch time now.
 
Are square videos still king or have vertical 9:16 ads taken over? I’m about to relaunch a campaign for e-com products and want to know what converts best these days.
Yes, vertical 9:16 videos definitely work better for Facebook ads now They grab attention more easily and get higher engagement square videos can still be used but for most campaigns vertical is the way to go.
 
Facebok is bot traffic now.
Instagram is the best for paid campaigns and make your ads as humorous as possible.
Even boomers are doom scroller these days and shorts is your best bet.
 
The trend is 9:16 vertical video as it takes up the entire mobile screen, resulting in the highest conversions on stories and reels. However, we recommend using 1:1 square for news feed as well to ensure optimal visibility across all locations.
 
Square works for retargeting, but new cold traffic loves full-screen vertical, results speak for themselves.
 
Vertical 9:16 videos under 30 seconds with captions and a strong hook work best in 2025.
 
Based on my recent testing, vertical 9:16 videos are performing the best right now, especially on mobile placements like Reels and Stories. They get higher watch time and engagement compared to square formats.
 
Are square videos still king or have vertical 9:16 ads taken over? I’m about to relaunch a campaign for e-com products and want to know what converts best these days.
“Meta is favoring full screen because of higher average viewing time. 9:16 = better organic reach, cheaper CPM, and the system is easily recognizable as ‘native’.
If you run ecom, especially impulse products, go for vertical visuals, close-ups, fast speeds. Square feeds still have a place, but treat them like remarketing, not top of funnel.”
 
Back
Top