Backlinksindexer or linklicious for indexing.

A

Ashique

Newbie

May 27, 2010

47

1

• Jul 7, 2011

• #1

I am working for a SEO company and we have many clients and the problem we are currently facing is the backlink indexing problem. After reading a while i found out it should be either backlinksindexer or linklicious that would do great on our indexing process.

What do you guys think is best? Please vote by your experience.

Also please do recommend the tool that would be best to go in the safe side which causes no downfall on keyword ranking to our clients.

Thanks

 

Last edited: Jul 7, 2011

seo jack

Junior Member

Apr 23, 2011

139

20

• Jul 7, 2011

• #2

We use linklicious.

 

A

Ashique

Newbie

May 27, 2010

47

1

• Jul 7, 2011
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #3

seo jack said:

We use linklicious.

Click to expand...

Hi SEO_Jack, so what do you think? Does that help in indexing process? And which plan are you using?

 

salocharly

Registered Member

Dec 13, 2010

81

29

• Jul 7, 2011

• #4

linklicious is working pretty well for me.....i know that without it my link where not getting indexed, awsome product I wish there where moor options there but it works as it is.....

 

seo jack

Junior Member

Apr 23, 2011

139

20

• Jul 7, 2011

• #5

Using the Pro plan. The monthly price is minimal yet it gets the job done. The admin allows you to spin the title/description nicely then they ping it for you.

We do ping our own feeds also and create backlinks to all the links we create for the client too (using auto approved blog commenting) for even faster indexing.

Indexing is the key, customers are impatient, they want EVERYTHING now! I know the feeling all too well.

Goodluck!

 

A

Ashique

Newbie

May 27, 2010

47

1

• Jul 7, 2011
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #6

Bump...

 

djamied

Newbie

Jul 4, 2011

33

0

• Jul 10, 2011

• #7

i haven't try both of them, so i can't suggest it to you..
im sorry

 

Z

zimmie

Newbie

Nov 1, 2008

1

0

• Aug 8, 2011

• #8

I have backlinksindexer but in then days there is no link indexed.

so i just disabled the account a waste off money for me.

maby someone have a better idea?

 

R

ronywilliam

Senior Member

Jan 20, 2011

1,158

436

• Aug 8, 2011

• #9

linklicious is better even though i'd recommend letting them index naturally...!

 

seoguy81

Senior Member

May 18, 2011

1,077

287

• Aug 22, 2011

• #10

I signed up for backlinksindexer few days back.. (still in my trial period). I know its too early to speculate but I don't see any difference what so ever.

 

neutralhatter

Regular Member

Jun 23, 2010

437

334

• Aug 22, 2011

• #11

Don't forget about lindexed. what's your experience with this...
Just tried it. and noticed some changes

 

N

nandos

Junior Member

Aug 5, 2010

144

19

• Aug 22, 2011

• #12

It really depends on how many backlinks you're creating.

If you're making 3000 a day a need those indexed then Linklicious is what you need. If you need 500 indexed a day then give BacklinksIndexer a try.

If you've got the budget you could even use both.

 

seoguy81

Senior Member

May 18, 2011

1,077

287

• Aug 22, 2011

• #13

In my view, Backlinksindexer report shows nothing except 'Pending' and 'Complete' if only they showed more data than that it would be of help. Yep I have around 1k backlinks from my web 2.0 properties.

 

Poppa Rotzee

Power Member

Apr 10, 2011

511

163

• Aug 25, 2011

• #14

Linklicious has stood the test of time and proven itself with happy customers

 

N

Nubby

Newbie

Jun 15, 2010

20

1

• Aug 28, 2011

• #15

Not really sure why this a comparison thread because both services are very different. In 2005 pinging backlinks was pretty effective, but the Search Engines aren't dumb and won't simply count links just because they said "hey look at me" aka pinging. The only real way to get them to last is backlinking and the mass syndication of BLI is what I've been using with great results for my web 2.0/article marketing (on a very large scale) and forum profile blasts. Linklicious is dated and I think more people are beginning to realize the power of the Backlinks Indexer network.

 

B

BardoStudios

Newbie

Aug 20, 2011

8

1

• Aug 28, 2011

• #16

Hey Nubby, how do you go about the mass syndication of backlinks?

 

strong12

Registered Member

Nov 15, 2007

66

15

• Aug 28, 2011

• #17

i no use backlinksindexer before but linklicious got. it work best for me.

 

VIC SEO

BANNED

Feb 19, 2010

2,172

368

• Aug 29, 2011

• #18

Many of my friends suggested linklicious to me and I have never come up with a reason of wanting to change.

 

n8800

Power Member

May 21, 2008

558

256

• Aug 29, 2011

• #19

BLI or backlink indexer SUCKS!!!! Go with Linklicious if you value your time and money!!!

 

N

Nubby

Newbie

Jun 15, 2010

20

1

• Aug 29, 2011

• #20

BardoStudios said:

Hey Nubby, how do you go about the mass syndication of backlinks?

Click to expand...

I buy accounts across the major article directories and outsource the writing/submission. Anyway, I came to realize that pinging was pretty much a waste of time and these articles are already understood to exist by Google but they weren't backlinked enough to be counted. That's when I started using backlinksindexer. Funny how people in this thread are talking LL up and have it in their signature...I don't have a horse in this race so I don't care but if you do article marketing/xrumer blasts on a large scale, or even medium you will understand how I came to the same conclusion as many others, pinging is a waste of time and $$ compared to real backlinks to backlinks.