Backlinking - Ping or Natural

Whatthe?

Junior Member

Mar 22, 2010

124

35

• Nov 29, 2010

• #1

Ok... just trying to get some input on how you guys are handling some of your backlinking. I'm not really into 'blasting' thousands of links, but I do like to do my fare share per week, per site.

So my question is, are you pinging all of your backlinks, or are you only ping'n a few (the higher PR) sites and letting google naturally find the others.

Thoughts and comments pls.

 

thisismymp3

Power Member

Jan 6, 2010

774

298

• Nov 29, 2010

• #2

ping the shit out of them who cares

 

thetraveller

BANNED

Mar 9, 2009

1,440

873

• Nov 29, 2010

• #3

I ping all of them to aged domains, but only a few for new domains, and let the rest go natural.

 

Whatthe?

Junior Member

Mar 22, 2010

124

35

• Nov 29, 2010
• Thread Starter Thread Starter

• #4

thetraveller said:

I ping all of them to aged domains, but only a few for new domains, and let the rest go natural.

Click to expand...

That was my thinking... as these will be new domains.

 

K

k.will

Newbie

Nov 30, 2010

33

2

• Nov 30, 2010

• #5

Well, pinging just help to get your links indexed more faster.

If you feel that natural link building is more important to you, than don't ping them and let Google themselves.

 

E

Extropy

Power Member

Jr. VIP

Apr 29, 2010

716

185

• Nov 30, 2010

• #6

If you are taking the time and money to build links, why not have them count? If you are worried about Google finding them too fast, then drip feed your links.

I had this same issue with my forum profiles so I built LTS.me (relaunching tomorrow). It'll turn your links into RSS feeds and then drip feed them out at whatever rate you specify.

Ping them so you get credit!

 

Q

Quo_Vadiz

Regular Member

Mar 12, 2010

259

47

• Nov 30, 2010

• #7

i always go for natural on new and old sites