- Mar 10, 2010
- 42,697
- 107,138
No, what i am saying is that just like your linkpushing service exploits loopholes in Googles ranking algorythm, this kid should try to find the best position he can using his brain. If the system were set up correctly, he would be employed and the equation would make sense, rendering this whole problem unnecesary. People revolt when there is an inbalance in a social or government system. Why would you just accept a financial system that obviously cares nothing for you and uses unfair and deceptive tactics? On a more primitive level, i think its in our makeup to want to solve problems that would otherwise be disadvantageous to us, because how else would a scrwany human being not wind up on a lions dinner plate if he didnt find a way to game the system. I by no means condone anything illegal but the education/lending business has become a lion and if you play by their rules, you will be a slave forever.
BTW...none of that stuff was meant as a personal attack and i only used your service as an example. I actually like your service but my point is that technically any action used to inflate links is an attempt to game the big G, so why not do that for things that are as important as the future of your financial solvency
No offense taken at all but not paying a debt is not exploiting the system.
It's hosing people and the banks' shareholders.
The fact of the matter is, in the banking industry, is that the banks aren't lending their own money. They are lending the money of the people that deposit in the banks. It's actually your and my money that is being lent.
If he bypassed the bank and borrowed directly from you, signed a contract to pay you back, and then said "Bleep Off!" you would not take kindly to that and neither would anyone else.
Being an honorable man means taking responsibility and not borrowing and then saying "Bleep Off!" but rather working to repay the debt.
Using various processes to rank in Google is different, I have no contract with Google, I never said to Google "I'll be a nice little boy and not take advantage of various loopholes."
On the other hand, back when I used to borrow money (I no longer do), I would sign a contract indicating the repayment terms and would adhere to those terms.
Big difference.
One is contractual and one is what only one party (Google) wants.
I don't want to see the debtor starving due to the debt but you make a deal, you stick with it and bite the bullet even if it sucks.
Again, no offense taken and this discussion should be helpful for many.