Asif Wilson Khan

Status
Not open for further replies.

BlackhatBen

BANNED
Joined
Dec 2, 2016
Messages
1
Reaction score
4
I got a long thread I spent time writing, banned by this clown, just for having the word "ewhoring" in it, even though it has little to do with it.

What really happened is that a low-iq individual couldn't form a coherent argument against what I wrote, and threw a temper tantrum like a four year old child.

I thought BHW was a serious forum.

Pretty pissed off that I wasted my time trying to help people make money.

Rant over. But beware of this person - he's full of ego, and stupid.
 
You'll be banned again now for multiple accounts.

5...4...3...2...1....gone
 
I read it and it was a really interesting twist to ewhoring without the necessity of ewhoring on your own at all (if you can set up an affiliate-program for it).

15+ years into IM and a decent amount of those years into adult previously, this was a refreshing read, unfortunately deleted.

@BlackhatBen if you didn't save it, I can send you the text via PM since I still have it open in another tab...
 
You are a clown dude. Your thread was shit.

You don't know anything bro.

Explain with logic if you can why this is incoherent.

Assumptions (based on empirical evidence)

1. People pay a premium to "normal" girls for their nudes if they can verify that they're real. This is compared to the alternative where they could browse porn for free.
2. People want to believe there is a human behind the computer

Structure

1. Since people are only paying for proof that a "normal" girl is behind an account, they are paying for verification.
2. So you employ social engineering to make a person pay for verification, which they are already doing by paying a premium according to 1. under the assumptions section
 
You don't know anything bro.

Explain with logic if you can why this is incoherent.

Assumptions (based on empirical evidence)

1. People pay a premium to "normal" girls for their nudes if they can verify that they're real. This is compared to the alternative where they could browse porn for free.
2. People want to believe there is a human behind the computer

Structure

1. Since people are only paying for proof that a "normal" girl is behind an account, they are paying for verification.
2. So you employ social engineering to make a person pay for verification, which they are already doing by paying a premium according to 1. under the assumptions section

This isn't 2009 man, that stuff is really played out. Might work, but why would you want to eWhore in 2016 or at all?
 
You are a clown dude. Your thread was shit.
To be fair, I don't know what exactly you are doing in IM or if you are even an active/successful IM. You sure do contribute a lot here and keep the forum clean from a lot of shit - but the one mentioned here was not one of these threads...
 
To be fair, I don't know what exactly you are doing in IM or if you are even an active/successful IM.You sure do contribute a lot here and keep the forum clean from a lot of shit - but the one mentioned here was not one of these threads...

To be fair if you couldn't see the flaws in the thread then I wonder what exactly you are doing in IM or if you are even an active/successful IM.
 
just for having the word "ewhoring" in it

It didn't just have the word "ewhoring" in it; it was splattered with ewhore/ewhores and was an ewhore method to boot.
  • People search for an eWhore
  • Do NOT allow your eWhores
  • Since the eWhore's names
  • Each eWhore has
  • Each eWhore make
  • Let's assume 30 eWhores
  • Another point, is that since the eWhore
Typically a thread like that would get a person a warning but since you are new it was just deleted.
 
To be fair if you couldn't see the flaws in the thread then I wonder what exactly you are doing in IM or if you are even an active/successful IM.
Besides it being dodgy/shady I didn't see a flaw. Your critique was pointless since you assumed that people are not willing to pay to get the confirmation if the hot chicks social profile they are following is real.

Since it was considered ewhoring (understandable) deletion is acceptable, just not the reasoning of it being stupid crap.
 
It's OK mate. I saved it


If you read the thread you'd know it wasn't eWhoring.



Marketing it
"Hey, I want to show you ___ baby. But I hate the scammers! They're ruining it for all of us :( So, I want you to feel that you can trust me before we ___. You can verify me over at adultverification.io"

You can either have an affiliate program, or deploy bots to run the entire thing yourself

First: HEY. IT wasn't eWhoring.
Second: Recites copy that's clearly eWhoring.
 
LOL. We've all had threads deleted OP, you aren't special. Just get over it and move on.
 
Besides it being dodgy/shady I didn't see a flaw. Your critique was pointless since you assumed that people are not willing to pay to get the confirmation if the hot chicks social profile they are following is real.

Since it was considered ewhoring (understandable) deletion is acceptable, just not the reasoning of it being stupid crap.

It is an over-complication of a simple method. The average e-whore is a broke clown they are not going to pay for verification, the guys that pay top dollar for nudes are not going to pay some 3rd party site for verification because these are the guys that have been scammed before, if they want proof then they will ask for a skype chat or pay for a cam show.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top