Articles for PBN?

I am sorry to interrupt this, not so entertaining, flamewar. There should be a huge notice put for all the newbies regarding spun content, because I can already see them spinning one article in Best Spinner and plastering it to 20 PBN sites and wondering why they are fucked.

So please, newbies, unless you know how to make amazing spun articles close to rewriting quality, do not attempt to post spun stuff on your PBN sites.

Good night Seattle.

Yep, but it has nothing to do with being a newbie. Hell, when I was a newbie, I was more careful than I am now. Just spin it, edit it, and make it readable. It does not have to be amazing. There's nothing wrong with buying cheap articles for your PBNs. It all depends if you want to spin it yourself or pay someone else to spin it for you and give you a "100% unique, high-quality, hand-written, well-researched, 100% Google first page" article. They are both the same thing.
 
Yep, but it has nothing to do with being a newbie. Hell, when I was a newbie, I was more careful than I am now. Just spin it, edit it, and make it readable. It does not have to be amazing. There's nothing wrong with buying cheap articles for your PBNs. It all depends if you want to spin it yourself or pay someone else to spin it for you and give you a "100% unique, high-quality, hand-written, well-researched, 100% Google first page" article. They are both the same thing.

You are still a newbie. I tried looking from your perspective but I am sorry you make zero sense. Your only objective to post here is to take a toll on me and trust me you are failing miserably at it. The other guys are at least making some sense
 
You are still a newbie. I tried looking from your perspective but I am sorry you make zero sense. Your only objective to post here is to take a toll on me and trust me you are failing miserably at it. The other guys are at least making some sense

Don't flatter yourself. You're making a good job on that yourself. After all, I wasn't the one who posted your article as proof. I just asked you to post your source and of course you had none. You probably didn't understand what you posted.
 
If you are into churn and burn with your money sites, go ahead and use spun content for your PBNs. Your money sites won't be ranking for very long, so it makes no sense to invest a lot into your PBNs either. Having said that, if you have clients or wish to use your PBN on long-term sites, then you should absolutely not be using spun content for the posts on your PBN. This has been evident for a while now and has nothing to do with the recent update, though the PBNs using spun content certainly did not leave themselves many chances with the recent spring-cleaning 'Fred' update.
 
What is the best way to get articles? I've got a ton of PBN's I'd like to create and I've got some decent domains but what's the best way to create articles? Should I spin them? Buy them? I really don't feel like writing 20+ quality articles is there a good way to have massive amounts of articles made? If so what do you guys use?

Either write them yourself or pay for them to be done properly.

At the end of the day you've spent cash setting up the PBN and taken time finding the right domains, it would be foolish to plug them full of half assed content and see your hard work come undone.

Think of it this way, it's a day or two of pain writing everything out and then you don't have to think about it again. That sounds like a good investment of time to me! :-)
 
Don't flatter yourself. You're making a good job on that yourself. After all, I wasn't the one who posted your article as proof. I just asked you to post your source and of course you had none. You probably didn't understand what you posted.
Give up on him lol. It is his way or no way.

There are a few people on here like that, they have a scary cult where they share information that hasn't been fully tested, and dismiss anything that goes against their ideology.

Then there are a few people that will take on board that there are other ways to do things.

People need to remember that not all PBNs need to be super HQ etc. You don't get any value out of your time spending time on these meaningless tasks, like making them look "unique" when they are a blatantly a pbn. Same with spun content, if you can do it well, in the eyes of a machine, it is the same as human-wrote content.
 
If you are into churn and burn with your money sites, go ahead and use spun content for your PBNs. Your money sites won't be ranking for very long, so it makes no sense to invest a lot into your PBNs either. Having said that, if you have clients or wish to use your PBN on long-term sites, then you should absolutely not be using spun content for the posts on your PBN. This has been evident for a while now and has nothing to do with the recent update, though the PBNs using spun content certainly did not leave themselves many chances with the recent spring-cleaning 'Fred' update.

God, how can you guys talk like you have list of proofs in your pocket.
Evident? what evident? My PBN is still live with SPUN CONTENT and still RANKING me even after all those updates.
If something happens to you once or twice, it is not evident, it might be just luck.

Give up on him lol. It is his way or no way.

There are a few people on here like that, they have a scary cult where they share information that hasn't been fully tested, and dismiss anything that goes against their ideology.

Then there are a few people that will take on board that there are other ways to do things.

People need to remember that not all PBNs need to be super HQ etc. You don't get any value out of your time spending time on these meaningless tasks, like making them look "unique" when they are a blatantly a pbn. Same with spun content, if you can do it well, in the eyes of a machine, it is the same as human-wrote content.

Exactly!
Google won't care you spent 2$ on each of your PBN logo. It won't matter even if you spent 50$ on crazy desginer logo in the day you will get a manual review, and in the meantime it won't give you better ranks.
Because of those trashtalks on threads like this one people are looking for "good looking PBN's" all over the marketplace, not even talking about metrics shit but it's different conversation.

The people who really know something about PBN's, know they shouldn't waste their time or money making their PBN look legit, because PBN just shouldn't look legit, period.
 
Last edited:
God, how can you guys talk like you have list of proofs in your pocket.
Evident? what evident? My PBN is still live with SPUN CONTENT and still RANKING me even after all those updates.
If something happens to you once or twice, it is not evident, it might be just luck.

You should take your own advice. Basing your entire argument on the fact that your PBN with spun content is still live. Strong sample size, bro. :rolleyes:
 
You should take your own advice. Basing your entire argument on the fact that your PBN with spun content is still live. Strong sample size, bro. :rolleyes:
That is what everyone else is basing it off.

And my spun net of 130 sites is still up. Every single site is still indexed.

It is all bullshit propaganda. Most people pushing hand-written content either provide it, or their buddy does.

Now, I take it as you have evidence to prove that handwritten content is more effective than spun content? Or are you just a guru like the rest?

I mean at least I accept the fact you can use both.
 
You should take your own advice. Basing your entire argument on the fact that your PBN with spun content is still live. Strong sample size, bro. :rolleyes:

It's ok, don't worry about it ;)
 
God, how can you guys talk like you have list of proofs in your pocket.
Evident? what evident? My PBN is still live with SPUN CONTENT and still RANKING me even after all those updates.
If something happens to you once or twice, it is not evident, it might be just luck.
They have no proof at all. Just talk.
 
They have no proof at all. Just talk.
Yup, but this guy from before is so confident because he has more posts and he is more active than us.
Let's like his post, he is guru we have to do that.
 
That is what everyone else is basing it off.

For someone reproaching people for making too many baseless assumptions, you sure seem to be throwing a lot of those around yourself.

Not sure why everyone treats a simple discussion as a popularity contest. Have fun.

EDIT: btw, nodyguy, based on your rather hostile attitude and incoherent writing style, we have reconsidered your review copy for which you have recently applied.
 
For someone reproaching people for making too many baseless assumptions, you sure seem to be throwing a lot of those around yourself.

Not sure why everyone treats a simple discussion as a popularity contest. Have fun.

EDIT: btw, nodyguy, based on your rather hostile attitude and incoherent writing style, we have reconsidered your review copy for which you have recently applied.

Hostile attitude? We are just discussing, this is what forum for.
But please, you can deny my application, it's ok.
 
For someone reproaching people for making too many baseless assumptions, you sure seem to be throwing a lot of those around yourself.

Not sure why everyone treats a simple discussion as a popularity contest. Have fun.

EDIT: btw, nodyguy, based on your rather hostile attitude and incoherent writing style, we have reconsidered your review copy for which you have recently applied.
Please highlight them for me.

Again, you are pushing handwritten content for sales, right?
 
Please highlight them for me.

Again, you are pushing handwritten content for sales, right?

I believe I did in the post you are replying to, but I see how the irony may have escaped you.

Not sure what you mean by your second comment. We do not sell content. We have been running a SEO agency for the past 5 years with 7 figures annually in sales. This is not a thinly veiled brag, but an indication of our sample size. Perhaps you are doing something different but, from what we have seen having worked on thousands of sites, using spun content for tier 1 link building is no where near as effective as it used to be and in many cases increases the likelihood of a penalty by a significant margin. But hey, continue calling others that disagree with you 'gurus'. I don't really care what you think, just thought I would chime in on an interesting discussion.
 
Back
Top