1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Are web 2.0 dead

Discussion in 'Black Hat SEO' started by seoworldin, Mar 14, 2017.

  1. seoworldin

    seoworldin Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2017
    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    This is reason why I'm asking and is mainly for wordpress.I had some strong web 2.0 with unique content manual created and own written content and some links from HAS as buzzfeed,Huffington and other.They get up to PA about 40 and give strong SEO boost to my money sites.They had TF about 5-7 and CF about 7-9 and all iner pages were indexed.Before 2 days when I cheked they were gone from Google and even metrics were lost. TF and CF now is 0.Yesterday and today Chek was same.0 nada because I thought that is some problems in majestic but result were same.What is the problem and this newest update take will take down all web 2.0 as SEO factor anymore.What is your thinking about this situation.
     
  2. aidenhera

    aidenhera Elite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,614
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    atm theres some update and a lot of sites have dissapeared not web20s only. even white hat sites were influenced, but mainly blackhat sites dissapeared. wait a little bit till it settles. right now the english serps change every 5 min
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  3. soccerlover

    soccerlover Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2014
    Messages:
    3,192
    Likes Received:
    1,683
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Seo Analyst :D
    Location:
    ♥♥♥ BHW ♥♥♥
    Home Page:
    I checked my stuff after reading this thread but metrics are same as it was couple of weeks earlier.
     
  4. crashdi

    crashdi Regular Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2011
    Messages:
    391
    Likes Received:
    135
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Financial Analyst
    Location:
    Japan
    No significant change on my stats too
     
  5. Mohamed Hanif

    Mohamed Hanif Newbie

    Joined:
    Mar 14, 2017
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Gender:
    Male
    Moreover many Web 2.0 sites are Pushed down and have to follow the new strategy
     
  6. Greengolegend

    Greengolegend BANNED BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2017
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    90
    Gender:
    Male
    We should male a 'this is dead' subforum this is 30% of post I see lately
     
  7. Nargil

    Nargil Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    4,002
    Likes Received:
    2,568
    Location:
    Europe
    Home Page:
    The fact that your web 2.0s lost links has nothing to do with them being dead. I also do not understand the logic - Google releases update and Majestic, which is a third party company, that has nothing to do with Google all of a sudden changes your TF metric to 0? Use your heads please. Thank you.

    I have tons of web 2.0s that have tons of links and are perfectly fine. Links get lost over time. It's normal and it's natural and nothing is dead.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  8. T2tkid

    T2tkid Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2010
    Messages:
    3,705
    Likes Received:
    1,694
    OP, If SEO is dead. What do you expect of web2.0s? web2.0s has died about 2 years ago. People who create them are just plain ignorant.
     
  9. Nargil

    Nargil Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    May 10, 2012
    Messages:
    4,002
    Likes Received:
    2,568
    Location:
    Europe
    Home Page:
    Yes and this is another way. Don't expect too much firepower from web 2.0s. For diversity and foundation they are still good, but investing too much in them is not a good idea at all.
     
  10. satruk

    satruk Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2012
    Messages:
    309
    Likes Received:
    42
    So bad :(
     
  11. ttmschine

    ttmschine Regular Member

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2013
    Messages:
    408
    Likes Received:
    187
    Even if Google haven't hit them yet, you can bet your bottom dollar they will at some point.
     
  12. Jason Bradbury

    Jason Bradbury Power Member

    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2016
    Messages:
    668
    Likes Received:
    83
    For low comp they are good
     
  13. bartosimpsonio

    bartosimpsonio Jr. VIP Jr. VIP Premium Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2013
    Messages:
    12,064
    Likes Received:
    10,837
    Occupation:
    WHEREZ MA
    Location:
    BITCOINS AT?
    Home Page:
    What I see is utter and complete spammy links ruling the most expensive kw's. These ain't even 2.0, not even 1.0 or 0.5.
     
  14. sirmeep

    sirmeep Registered Member

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2017
    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    36
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Professional Muppet
    Location:
    Ehhhh.... Somewhere Awesome
    Agreed... I don't even understand the point of these posts. Like do the answers actually provide the poster any value??
     
  15. CookServers

    CookServers Junior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2017
    Messages:
    107
    Likes Received:
    7
    Based on my tests, it looks like a lot of mainstream web2.0 sites are really dead if you are thinking of using those for SERP purposes. Previously, a simple blast on the web2.0 will get it ranked sky high. Now, it just enters a regular ranking factor, and no longer has an edge there. Possibly if there's a web2.0 that hasn't been totally exploited - that should be gold instead.
     
  16. fc-dh

    fc-dh Elite Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2012
    Messages:
    1,800
    Likes Received:
    1,393
    Occupation:
    Blackhatting
    Location:
    Den Haag | Netherlands
    TF and CF have nothing to do with Google
     
  17. ZachMiller

    ZachMiller Jr. VIP Jr. VIP

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2016
    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    52
    Gender:
    Male
    Occupation:
    Email & Sales Funnel Consultant
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    Home Page:
    It's all in the application of your Web 2.0s.

    I have them as part of my link building strategy.. but of course, there is more to diversify links, such as:

    EDU Links
    Profile Links
    Web 2.0s
    Article Submissions (WordAI spun, max 10 submissions)
    Manual DA50+ Article Submissions
    GSA SER Link Campaigns
    Indexing

    So, again.. it's application to your client/site and how you have BEEN BUILDING with them in the past.

    Are you going back and forth between white/black-hat techniques?

    Are you posing split tests to figure out if a certain method you recently used is to blame?

    Some SEO campaigns take up to 30 days to see the full effects.. Google creates this stagger effect [on positive white-hat SEO even] to see if you will continue in your efforts month after month.
     
  18. scentedGhost

    scentedGhost Newbie

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2016
    Messages:
    29
    Likes Received:
    3
    Gender:
    Female
    Occupation:
    Dishwasher
    Web 2.0s is not dead. But I have some question. And I can't find in the threads here. I already submitted to almost 50sites as part of my link building but can I still submit to the same web 2.0s sites again? I mean pointing it back again to the same money site.
     
  19. roki4ka

    roki4ka Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2016
    Messages:
    869
    Likes Received:
    637
    use 1 link per web2.0 to your site and 1 pointing to high authority website or wiki page
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1
  20. aidenhera

    aidenhera Elite Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2016
    Messages:
    1,614
    Likes Received:
    283
    Gender:
    Male
    IMO one link per domain is great if you just started.
     
    • Thanks Thanks x 1