Are blogs dying?

people are not willing to spend time on reading big articles or blog, instead videos are giving them what they want in very few mins

the irony, however, is that google doesn't rank you if you don't have entire volumes of content on your site, and yet, they always brag about how nobody wants to read long articles and how videos are the future and blah blah blah. You gotta love google's hypocrisy
 
when you look for some thing..what do you prefer? a long text or video by a beautiful girl? ..people prefer video over text

I AM people, and I don't prefer videos... never have, and never will. Unless they are Jackie Chan movies when my man Jackie had been at his best in the 80s... and also some music videos that remind me of my childhood in the 80s and 90s. That's the only time I prefer videos, otherwise I don't give a shit about them and that despite of the fact that I don't like reading, either. But when I read I feel less manipulated than when I watch videos, and that probably helps with my hate towards videos
 
Blog are not dead for people with a little common sense. You don't own a YouTube channel, you do a website. Always better to fully own and have full control over an asset, than commit 100's of hours work with a chance of it being taken away with the click of the fingers.
Blogs will not die.

Because youtube like third party sites will ban or destroy your channel anytime without notification.

But if you build your audience through blogs you can't destroyed by anyone.
There one caveat though that you are missing. Actually two.
First, google owns you website , sorta , because it owns the traffic.
Second, google and YouTube are same company.
 
No, when you think about it. Facebook and Twitter are just really big Blogs that everyone signed up for and comment and post on.

No, Facebook and Twitter can't be labeled as "blogs". A blog is generally run by a single person/team as a content-based website. Facebook and Twitter don't create their own content, they run on UGC.
 
No, Facebook and Twitter can't be labeled as "blogs". A blog is generally run by a single person/team as a content-based website. Facebook and Twitter don't create their own content, they run on UGC.
Totally agree. Also technically a blog is a static page and facebook and twitter pages are dynamic pages, pages created on the fly by plugging in data. So one facebook dynamic page creates billions of pages.
 
No, Facebook and Twitter can't be labeled as "blogs". A blog is generally run by a single person/team as a content-based website. Facebook and Twitter don't create their own content, they run on UGC.
Twitter is known as a "microblogging" platform.

Maybe the entire website can't be called a blog, but individual profiles are technically blogs. They're regularly updated with content which blogs are.
 
Twitter is known as a "microblogging" platform.

Maybe the entire website can't be called a blog, but individual profiles are technically blogs. They're regularly updated with content which blogs are.

Twitter is a microblogging platform, sure but it is not a blog per se, which is what the OP alluded to in the post above.
 
Get paid traffic to anything which makes ROI. End of story. Thread closed
 
Back
Top