Are AI generated blog posts actually ranking long term?

article written with the assistance of AI will retain their rankings as long as they are valuable and contain the correct information. It also has to be in line with what the users are looking for. It is not about whether the article has been written using AI or not. It is all about the value of the content.

When many articles of poor quality have been created using AI they do lose their visibility after an update. however if the content has been well edited then it does perform well.

The bigger question for me is what happens six months later.

Even a solid post can lose relevance when its sources, examples or product details get old. AI makes it easy to publish more, but that also creates a lot more pages to maintain.

I've noticed the same thing it seems like AI can help with drafting but I'd expect long term results to depend more on content quality and useful updates over time I'd be interested to hear from anyone who has tracked AI assisted posts through recent updates

Everyone in this thread is arguing about whether AI content ranks, and honestly I think you're all polishing the deck chairs on the Titanic.

The real question isn't "does Google rank AI content." It's "how long does Google ranking matter at all."

I've seen way better results once I started blending my own stories or opinions into AI drafts - Google seems to eat that up compared to cookie-cutter posts. Sometimes I just riff on what the AI spits out instead of following its structure, too. If you sneak in quotes from actual sources or interviews, it really helps to set your content apart.

the AI generated content will have no problem ranking for a long time if it is practical well written and updated.however lowquality or uninteresting content will usually lose rankings eventually when Google evaluates its relevance and usefulness.