Apollo 11: Did we goto the moon?

klique

Elite Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2011
Messages
2,328
Reaction score
1,751
In conjunction with a post I made awhile regarding the NASAS Apollo 11 moon landing hoax theory. This isn't my channel, video nor am I affiliated with it in anyway.

I really began to take a deeper look into space and space travel over the past 18 months, and during that time stumbled upon the moon landing theory. At first I thought it was all just a bunch of chit chat prior to looking into it myself. But after a lot of research, I've came to the conclusion that yes we did go to the moon.. just not when/how we said we did.

There are a bunch of moon landing hoax videos on the internet, this one popped up in my suggested videos a couple days ago and it has some really good points, and things that don't add up to the official story released by NASA. Have a little free time? Interested in space? Or just want to find a reason to disagree with me? Whatever the reason feel free to check out this lecture on the subject and come back and drop your feedback on whether you think we went, and/or if the official story seems a bit suspect after watching/listening to the video.

Did NASA goto the moon in '69?
 
I didnt watch it, but how were the reflectors that you can use from the earth (reflect lasers) placed if they didnt go to the moon?
 
We will get to there soon
btc_r_1x.png
 
'A funny thing happened on the way to the moon' is an interesting one with a footage of the astronauts faking the window so it looks that they are farther away from the earth, but they are at the same height as International Space Station.

I haven't been there yet, i wish i had some selfies from the holiday a few of my friends took last year <><
 
I've found that just about all of the moon landing hoax theories rely in selective still frames from a few videos, but intentionally overlook the tens of thousands of publicly available audio and video documenting nearly every hour of every flight.

For the immense budget it would take to accurately fake so much footage, and to pay off the ~400,000 people involved, it would be far more effective to simply plant spies in the Soviet program to create delays.
 
I don't know what to think,
but I love "Adam ruins everything".
So...
 
I got hit by a car while riding my bicycle coming back from Carvel with ice cream for my Father and I that day by the Grandaughter of the owner of Jenkinson's Pavillion.

Ice cream was a total loss but I got free everything there for the rest of the summer so there was some value in that.

For that reason I say we did land on the moon.
 
I've found that just about all of the moon landing hoax theories rely in selective still frames from a few videos, but intentionally overlook the tens of thousands of publicly available audio and video documenting nearly every hour of every flight.

For the immense budget it would take to accurately fake so much footage, and to pay off the ~400,000 people involved, it would be far more effective to simply plant spies in the Soviet program to create delays.
Except for that NASA admits they have no technology that can bring humans through the van allen belt and that the old technology was "lost".

 
Elon's sending a Japanese billionaire and a few others to the moon in 2023, I'm sure a few more conspiracy theories like the one above are gonna crop up a few years after that's done. Oh and, they're gonna be streaming that in full HD and VR so I guess that's gonna be faked too.
 
Except for that NASA admits they have no technology that can bring humans through the van allen belt and that the old technology was "lost".
The video didn't say the technology was lost or that the barrier is impassible...

Also, how could any of the technology be lost when the original prototypes are sitting in museums?
 
The video didn't say the technology was lost or that the barrier is impassible...

Also, how could any of the technology be lost when the original prototypes are sitting in museums?
Yeah i checked now, its the wrong video. He doesnt say the technology was lost but they say it in some other video.

BUT, he does admit that bringing humans through Van Allen Belts is a problem needed to be solved before we can bring humans through it. from 3 min mark.

Edit: Just to be clear, im not of the opinion that the moon landings are 100% fake, but i find this very interesting to say the least.
 
BUT, he does admit that bringing humans through Van Allen Belts is a problem needed to be solved before we can bring humans through it. from 3 min mark.
It is indeed a problem that needs to be solved to eliminate the radiation exposure to those on board.

But the Apollo program didn't have some long-lost technology that needs to be rediscovered, they just underestimated the risks of radiation exposure, and had a much higher threshold of "safe".
 
It is indeed a problem that needs to be solved to eliminate the radiation exposure to those on board.

But the Apollo program didn't have some long-lost technology that needs to be rediscovered, they just underestimated the risks of radiation exposure, and had a much higher threshold of "safe".
He says they currently can not send humans through the Van Allen Belts, and theres another video where they say the technology was lost. I dont have time to dig it up now but i could do it later if u are genuinly interested.

Edit: Found it, here:

They Destroyed the technology. So yeah, it wasnt lost.
 
He says they currently can not send humans through the Van Allen Belts, and theres another video where they say the technology was lost. I dont have time to dig it up now but i could do it later if u are genuinly interested.
The belt is not some physical barrier blocking the rockets, it's a high radiation dose that is considered dangerously high by today's standards.

The Apollo astronauts suffered radiation-related health issues at a far higher rate than even low-earth-orbit astronauts, so rediscovering this "lost" technology will by no means solve the problem. (The higher rate of health problems should itself be an indicator that the Apollo astronauts went beyond LEO.)
 
The belt is not some physical barrier blocking the rockets, it's a high radiation dose that is considered dangerously high by today's standards.

The Apollo astronauts suffered radiation-related health issues at a far higher rate than even low-earth-orbit astronauts, so rediscovering this "lost" technology will by no means solve the problem. (The higher rate of health problems should itself be an indicator that the Apollo astronauts went beyond LEO.)
Alright i might have overestimated the level of danger of the radiation caused by the Van Allen Belts, cheers!
 
Every time I come across some investigation like 'Did we go to the moon?' I wonder how people try to find out the ultimate truth without
a) professional knowledge (we are not experts)
b) enough initial data (we were told just a little)
So, I believe that all we could say after photos and materials on Apollo 11 investigations is 'Photos are fake!'. That's it. Nothing more. And we can not judge if astronauts flew to the Moon, or landed, or came back... and even why the pictures were faked.

Who knows, maybe they had reached the Moon, completed a few tasks and died there? Technologically, it was possible.
 
What is the point of sending to moon and going to moon when we can not live there? I saw some planet like earth discovery few days ago.. Tell our Musk bro to put attention there...

just my 3 cents
 
Back
Top