suruchibali
Newbie
- Apr 19, 2016
- 25
- 0
Waow, nice idea indeed will definitely try out this technique.
OMG!!! 28.4 Million Backlinks.
OMG!!! 28.4 Million Backlinks.
Anyone tried manipulating Google Cached webpage as a backlink?
- Thread starter Gintas
- Start date
- Mar 21, 2013
- 24,780
- 31,549
Waow, nice idea indeed will definitely try out this technique.
OMG!!! 28.4 Million Backlinks.
Still not sure if this thread is serious.
tripartist1
Regular Member
- Sep 19, 2013
- 203
- 150
Everyone here worrying about if this makes a good backlink, meanwhile I see a parasite capable of taking a ridiculous amount of spam links, being on a google domain and all........
Nonetheless, nice out of the box thinking. Good to get juices flowing.
Nonetheless, nice out of the box thinking. Good to get juices flowing.
aidenhera
BANNED
- Nov 30, 2016
- 3,059
- 915
but if there are indexed instances of that in G already, doesnt it matter we can index it too lol
Maybe they wanted robots to actually follow "nofollow" links as well as blocked by robots.txt sites and look for affilates/other shady stuff, and thus it ended in index
- Mar 21, 2013
- 24,780
- 31,549
The cache pages are the index itself. If Google counted those it'd be counting links twice.
This could work if there was a major bug at Google, but even if there were, it's gone after this is public knowledge.
tripartist1
Regular Member
- Sep 19, 2013
- 203
- 150
You can view cached pages even if the site is down though. These pages are just like any other, so unless/until googles algo doesn't crawl them (since they dont really need crawling), these pages are indexable as a separate page, though they may not pass much juice.
- Mar 21, 2013
- 24,780
- 31,549
Those cache pages are pulling their data straight from the google index. How's google gonna index everything all over again from its own index?
SERP pages can be PR 10, so you're saying let's reindex Google's own SERPs for PR.
tripartist1
Regular Member
- Sep 19, 2013
- 203
- 150
I wasnt interested in this for backlinks, I'm interested in it because it's a domain owned by google, with it's own metrics, meaning it can be spammed with low quality links in high numbers (I'd assume G wouldn't ding it's own domain, though this would probably need to be tested). Unless I'm missing something here. As far as google reindexing its own index, you said it yourself, it's broken lol.
Maybe someone should try to rank one of these for an awful low comp KW and share the results.
Oh yeah, it's broken, Google caches it's own cache lol:
And yes, URLs are different:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/custom?q=cache:1d0paa8ErWAJ:www.rhetorik.ch/Massen/Massen.html+beeinflussung&num=1&hl=en&prmd=ivns&strip=1&vwsrc=0
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:wrUYjocNr1sJ:webcache.googleusercontent.com/custom?q=cache:1d0paa8ErWAJ:www.rhetorik.ch/Massen/Massen.html+beeinflussung&num=1&hl=en&prm d=ivns&strip=1&vwsrc=0+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=opera
theoretically you could make it link like this: 3rd level cache -> 2nd level cache -> 1st level cache -> money site. But not sure if that's of any use...
But we can make a conclusion out of this fact, that webcache.googleusercontent.com is most likely being treated completely just like every other domain, so Google would definitely consider this backlink as valid.
And yes, URLs are different:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/custom?q=cache:1d0paa8ErWAJ:www.rhetorik.ch/Massen/Massen.html+beeinflussung&num=1&hl=en&prmd=ivns&strip=1&vwsrc=0
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:wrUYjocNr1sJ:webcache.googleusercontent.com/custom?q=cache:1d0paa8ErWAJ:www.rhetorik.ch/Massen/Massen.html+beeinflussung&num=1&hl=en&prm d=ivns&strip=1&vwsrc=0+&cd=5&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us&client=opera
theoretically you could make it link like this: 3rd level cache -> 2nd level cache -> 1st level cache -> money site. But not sure if that's of any use...
But we can make a conclusion out of this fact, that webcache.googleusercontent.com is most likely being treated completely just like every other domain, so Google would definitely consider this backlink as valid.
suruchibali
Newbie
- Apr 19, 2016
- 25
- 0
Let's give it a try according to my opinion.
- Nov 3, 2010
- 1,618
- 1,265
Hello BHW brothers and sisters,
To expand on your theory. You can delete all extra data to the right of the cached url and add your own numbers letters etc. Then build to the backlinks in mass volume to a variety of links instead of one for diversification.
For Example:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:AbCdE_exQJ:www.yoururl.com/1
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:AbCdE_exQJ:www.yoururl.com/2
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:AbCdE_exQJ:www.yoururl.com/3
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:AbCdE_exQJ:www.yoururl.com/4
And so on...
To expand on your theory. You can delete all extra data to the right of the cached url and add your own numbers letters etc. Then build to the backlinks in mass volume to a variety of links instead of one for diversification.
For Example:
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:AbCdE_exQJ:www.yoururl.com/1
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:AbCdE_exQJ:www.yoururl.com/2
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:AbCdE_exQJ:www.yoururl.com/3
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:AbCdE_exQJ:www.yoururl.com/4
And so on...
suruchibali
Newbie
- Apr 19, 2016
- 25
- 0
Hi,
Thanks for the explanation but can you please be more specific to me, I am sorry but I am a newbie so need step by step explanation.
Please correct me if I am wrong:
STEP 1 Find out the cached url for which you have to do backlinking.
For example http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:iJ9C94XSdlkJ:happyvalentineimages.com/+&cd=1&hl=en&ct=clnk
STEP 2 Remove everything after happyvalentineimages.com from the cached url and put the numbers like 1, 2, 3 and so on.
For example http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:iJ9C94XSdlkJ:happyvalentineimages.com/1.
STEP 3 Go and create backlink for these different cached urls on different high authorities websites.
Thanks & Regards
Suruchi Bali
Possible, but this would cause duplicate content issues, wouldn't it? Depends on how Google treats it
Last edited:
aidenhera
BANNED
- Nov 30, 2016
- 3,059
- 915
create second website, put some content with backlinks and let it cache. just in case. it shouldnt really be "duplicate content issue" cause sites i checked are still doing well.
- Mar 21, 2013
- 24,780
- 31,549
I am 99% sure Google completely ignores any domain they use for their search. Cache links are worthless.
Anyway after this thread this loophole will be closed, if it ever existed.
aidenhera
BANNED
- Nov 30, 2016
- 3,059
- 915
no pain no gain
WeWontBeAlone
Regular Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 489
- 40
Interesting thread, really cool concept too, but the question sitll remains if this is worth the effort to try
living2xl
Elite Member
- Dec 9, 2011
- 1,968
- 530
ive already pretty much proven its useless
I can write it out more detailed with screens and all but im not feeling that generous right now and a bit lazy now
