ANTI DECT BROWSER tests

mobzzzx said:

Guys... the uniqueness score for multilogin is 99.45% and the second picture is for gologin surly in this case gologin is better for uniqueness for canvas finger printing no? Or am i reading the data wrong?

This just shows finger printing feature is better than mutilogin? Considering the finger printing are the biggest feature in these anti detect browsers.. why is mutlilogin uniqueness bad? Considering everyone say they are the best..?

Click to expand...

AlbertoMR3 said:

For what purpose you are using them?

For most things the most unique the finger pint is, the worst. And Ideally fingerprint should match the mimiqued device. That means that all macbooks from of same model and using same Chrome version will have mostly the same fingerprint. And that is not bad, is how it suppose to be. You can for sure as webmaster try to generate a more unique fingerprint for identify your users. But there aren't to many options for that since things you can identify are limited.

The true is that fingerprinting is mainly used to check if you are falking a device user agent mostly. And for that is pretty good as is impossible to know what fingerprint will left a device... In for example Gmail login, unless you actually log in with that device and capture the scripts that generates the canvas fingerprint.

Click to expand...

mobzzzx said:

Guys... the uniqueness score for multilogin is 99.45% and the second picture is for gologin surly in this case gologin is better for uniqueness for canvas finger printing no? Or am i reading the data wrong?

This just shows finger printing feature is better than mutilogin? Considering the finger printing are the biggest feature in these anti detect browsers.. why is mutlilogin uniqueness bad? Considering everyone say they are the best..?

Click to expand...

svinki said:

learn basics about internet anonymity and how antifraud systems works.

uniqueness score 100% doesn't mean gologin is better antidetect than multilogin

thats just mean they use canvas noise that create totaly unique combination, which is alert for antifraud system. Because if you check canvas fingerprint on real devices and real browsers, you will see that none of them is 100% unique. If you go against top antifraud systems, you need to look like a real person who use real browser. In case of FB . also behavior patterns, age of accounts, payment method, etc.....

Click to expand...

svinki said:

learn basics about internet anonymity and how antifraud systems works.

uniqueness score 100% doesn't mean gologin is better antidetect than multilogin

thats just mean they use canvas noise that create totaly unique combination, which is alert for antifraud system. Because if you check canvas fingerprint on real devices and real browsers, you will see that none of them is 100% unique. If you go against top antifraud systems, you need to look like a real person who use real browser. In case of FB . also behavior patterns, age of accounts, payment method, etc.....

Click to expand...

mobzzzx said:

So anti detect browser needs atleast 100 users?

so a 100% unique browser is not good for running facebook ads? Can you suggest a cheaper alternative browser then? I am only running ads on my girlfriends account as my current one is disabled and waiting for response. Do not want to sign into my usual browser as this will of course flag her account.

Click to expand...

mobzzzx said:

Guys... the uniqueness score for multilogin is 99.45% and the second picture is for gologin surly in this case gologin is better for uniqueness for canvas finger printing no? Or am i reading the data wrong?

This just shows finger printing feature is better than mutilogin? Considering the finger printing are the biggest feature in these anti detect browsers.. why is mutlilogin uniqueness bad? Considering everyone say they are the best..?

Click to expand...