Another proof that Google does not know the difference between good and bad content.

30k visitors per day according to the research of the Ahrefs tool.
Eyeballing, this is about $150 per day.

Is this like lambo or something?
I think our definition of success varies greatly.

you have such a negative attitude...

This website did a great job to bring traffic to their site.

Stop shitting on people's success.
 
you have such a negative attitude...

This website did a great job to bring traffic to their site.

Stop shitting on people's success.
Today I wrecked only one thread.
Next time it will get better.

Edit: on another website someone called me negative as well.
And on youtube too.
In the real world they do the same.

This is crazy!

But if you look closer, my messages are just challenging for people.
So yeah, people either don't like being challenged or they want to hear comfortable things.
It's not my problem.

But how the f*k do you want to be a millionaire if you have issues with dealing with someone?
I just post my thoughts I got from over 2 decades of life.

I won't fucking adjust it every fucking time to please everyone. Damn it.
 
Last edited:
So guys, is this your definition of success?

Expect to get stucked if you reach this type of "success" one day.

If it's appealing to you, you may reach the point and don't know what to do next.

Today I had a thought to do it but white hat and I was completely serious to myself.

I was thinking of creating one of the biggest websites in the world for specific purpose.

Without spinning content.

You should be concerned with levels we are at. I feel like it's kindergarten vs high school battle.
It won't do.
 
So guys, is this your definition of success?

Expect to get stucked if you reach this type of "success" one day.

If it's appealing to you, you may reach the point and don't know what to do next.

Today I had a thought to do it but white hat and I was completely serious to myself.

I was thinking of creating one of the biggest websites in the world for specific purpose.

Without spinning content.

You should be concerned with levels we are at. I feel like it's kindergarten vs high school battle.
It won't do.
Its fine, man, we're all allowed to have our own approaches to success.

Also, consider the fact that, given that this is a black hat forum, its more than likely that most people (including me) here will be really impressed by the case study OP presented.

Moralizing doesn't really do anything for anyone, and the thread just ends up degenerating into ad hominem sniping back and forth.


Now, regarding OP's post: thanks for sharing, OP -- as a recovering white hat SEO, I need all the inspiration I can get :)
 
Its fine, man, we're all allowed to have our own approaches to success.

Also, consider the fact that, given that this is a black hat forum, its more than likely that most people (including me) here will be really impressed by the case study OP presented.

Moralizing doesn't really do anything for anyone, and the thread just ends up degenerating into ad hominem sniping back and forth.


Now, regarding OP's post: thanks for sharing, OP -- as a recovering white hat SEO, I need all the inspiration I can get :)
White hat or black hat sounds like some sort of a political discourse.

I know a guy who pumped out 500k articles using only manpower.
 
Some more observations on the site OP shared - - the categories make no sense whatsoever lol
Funny how people have really different approaches that all work. I was completely bought into the RYS "Semantic SEO" approach, so it blows my mind how, after learning to set up 'entities' etc you see someone crushing it just using automation and scaling :)

Here's is a website with AI-generated content: https://www.mvorganizing.org/

The content is bullshit, hard to read, scraped from other websites, spun, etc. The worst you could do basically. The ai generated content is readable, but no real advice are given throughout the articles, it's like looking into the void.

Almost half a million posts were published in 2 months, congrats, here are the results:
 
But if you look closer, my messages are just challenging for people.
So yeah, people either don't like being challenged or they want to hear comfortable things.
It's not my problem.

But how the f*k do you want to be a millionaire if you have issues with dealing with someone?
I just post my thoughts I got from over 2 decades of life.

I won't fucking adjust it every fucking time to please everyone. Damn it.
I assure you that your messages do not seem 'challenging', but rather, it really does seem like you troll people a lot.
 
Some more observations on the site OP shared - - the categories make no sense whatsoever lol
Funny how people have really different approaches that all work. I was completely bought into the RYS "Semantic SEO" approach, so it blows my mind how, after learning to set up 'entities' etc you see someone crushing it just using automation and scaling :)
There is a guy on the forum selling software that allows you to produce content based on "markov chains". He claims it's enough to get ranked.
 
There is a guy on the forum selling software that allows you to produce content based on "markov chains". He claims it's enough to get ranked.
I'm playing around with Markov chains as well, I've been using them to generate social media comments.
I have no doubt Markov content ranks amazingly well. IIRC Kyle Roof ranked a site using placeholder content so Markov must work.
 
Did they automate this process or use VAs?
Did they use an expired domain to rank faster? Looks like they did use expired domain
 
Last edited:
I'm going to drop my 2 cents here.
1 cent will be about the fact is bad to call other people site out on a forum like this one. If you manage in future to rank similar and someone will call your site here, you're going to cry very badly.
2 cent I will call this kind of ranking "random shit" ....happened to me a lot in last 3-4 years in google. But I will not dive too much in details.

Here is some secret sauce, manage to index your shit, and you will rank!
 
I'm going to drop my 2 cents here.
1 cent will be about the fact is bad to call other people site out on a forum like this one. If you manage in future to rank similar and someone will call your site here, you're going to cry very badly.
2 cent I will call this kind of ranking "random shit" ....happened to me a lot in last 3-4 years in google. But I will not dive too much in details.

Here is some secret sauce, manage to index your shit, and you will rank!
True. These websites only manage to get indexed and get traffic from random keywords from 5th or 8th page. If something is ultra long tail, they hit 1st page.
 
True. These websites only manage to get indexed and get traffic from random keywords from 5th or 8th page. If something is ultra long tail, they hit 1st page.
Years back, almost no one "hunted" long tails or tier 3 traffic, old gold days. But still there is room to gain. You probably know this is similar with making loads of cash from garbage. I mean, imagine 100M long keys with volume 5-20 sitting on first page :D and still people try to rank investing a lot on PBN and Neil Patel courses and so on...
 
I'm going to drop my 2 cents here.
1 cent will be about the fact is bad to call other people site out on a forum like this one. If you manage in future to rank similar and someone will call your site here, you're going to cry very badly.
2 cent I will call this kind of ranking "random shit" ....happened to me a lot in last 3-4 years in google. But I will not dive too much in details.

Here is some secret sauce, manage to index your shit, and you will rank!

"index your shit"... actually when your domain has some authority and is more than 1 years old, the indexing part comes naturally. I never had to force indexing personally. The indexing problem is only for new domains with very low authority from what I saw. If you stick to nurture your domain, google gives you some credit and index your links pretty fast. Just a bit of patience, right?
 
Back
Top