When I said random shit I said cause sometimes you can index pretty fast any kind of garbage on new fresh domains, but sometimes you can burn 1000 domains, and you can't index more than 5-10 links. Sometimes you manage to index up to 5-10k then you go shadow, and they drop you to 4-7 and domain is pretty dead, you can get it back with some 301 but not works every time.Just a bit of patience, right?
I'm playing around with Markov chains as well, I've been using them to generate social media comments.
I have no doubt Markov content ranks amazingly well. IIRC Kyle Roof ranked a site using placeholder content so Markov must work.
BrilliantTrying to play with autoblogs myself. This guy did a very good job, just imagine how easy is to scale these autoblogs....
If one of mine goes well, I will know how to replicate and scale it 100x. Current result of my first one, done 3 more using different content generation techniques, lets see how it goes....
Not as easy as it seems. Stop saying it's easy. It's hard af.Trying to play with autoblogs myself. This guy did a very good job, just imagine how easy is to scale these autoblogs....
If one of mine goes well, I will know how to replicate and scale it 100x. Current result of my first one, done 3 more using different content generation techniques, lets see how it goes....
Why do you say the website won't last long before DMCA and manual penalty? Isn't it spun content?This is not my competitor, I am just pointing out someone who has spun half a million articles with results. The website won't last long before DMCA and manual penalty, but the success is crazy.
Yeah, it didn't make sense, but I had no strength to comment further.Why do you say the website won't last long before DMCA and manual penalty? Isn't it spun content?
I checked the content, it's not that bad. It doesn't seem hard to read nor spun. They even got table of contents and relevant images to each heading.The content is bullshit, hard to read, scraped from other websites, spun, etc. The worst you could do basically.
I don't know if you are serious.I checked the content, it's not that bad. It doesn't seem hard to read nor spun. They even got table of contents and relevant images to each heading.
Some advice may be too broad but I wouldn't consider it junk.
Maybe the content is better on the homepage but it's admirable that they can scale automation at fairly decent quality.
Not sure if you understand. I said the quality isn't bad, which it isn't, it's not hard to read and it's not spun. All true. Duplicate doesn't mean junk and it ranks in a lot of cases.Duplicate
Yes, i agree that Duplicate doesn't mean junk. Google is unpredictable some times too in the way it ranks pagesNot sure if you understand. I said the quality isn't bad, which it isn't, it's not hard to read and it's not spun. All true. Duplicate doesn't mean junk and it ranks in a lot of cases.
Get me a $5000 domain from auction and I'll rank my face on Mark Zuckerberg.Not sure if you understand. I said the quality isn't bad, which it isn't, it's not hard to read and it's not spun. All true. Duplicate doesn't mean junk and it ranks in a lot of cases.
This is not auto generated content.well nothing new, auto generated sites work since ages and they will keep working!
while the metrics of ahrefs are just estimates and not real numbers, you can get enough traffic with big auto generated sites if you do it right.
they can also last a long time (years) its not always just churn&burn tactics, but thats the first thing whitehats will reply "it won't last long"... thats bs and how would someone know who hasn't tried?![]()