AMR Results - Updated Stats & Indexing...

I have 8000 subs green, but from this 8000 just 1000 subs. And this are 300 live links. Is this normal ? Must i scrape more article list from google too with scrapebox. Or do you mean i make a mistake. My list have 6000 not accepting articles from the green ones.
Dang3r

that sounds about right! Now blacklist all the sites that don't accept your submissions 6 times in a row, and you'll end up with a 'clean' 1k list.

The VAST majority of sites that are 'green' and allow sign ups are WordPress blogs and will NEVER accept a submission.
 
I thank you so much for your answer.
I am thought it is since 6 month ago. There was more subs by this big list :)

But i try to scrape more articles now to get more AA Subs.

By the way, i am now a member by your ubertoolz. Thats was the last thing which i had needed ;)

Cheers
Dang3r
 
The AMR landscape has changed a LOT over the last 12 months...

At the start of the year I was getting 1,600-2,000 successful submission every run, and I could get 500-900 indexed within a couple of weeks... Not so anymore!

Glad to have you onboard! You'll see the AMR specific guidelines we've now added, and also the Mass Submission general guidelines. If you're a premium member, with the free content, then AMR (and SENuke, UAW etc) has never been so easy!
 
I started first with the standard member. I have my own script for contents.

But when standard is not enough i upgrade :)

For more live links, we must think outside the blog with other links and progs ;)

Cheers
Dang3r
 
I have a different experience.

I blasted all at once with 70% spun articles (no dripfeedinng) and many duplicate titles. After 4 weeks, 100 links got indexed, 200 were not. I tried lindexed and it didn't help with indexing, just crawling.

Bookmarking helped, i bookmarked 100 articles and 30 additional got indexed and i moved from 9 to 5 for a pretty competitive keyword.
 
I have a different experience.

I blasted all at once with 70% spun articles (no dripfeedinng) and many duplicate titles. After 4 weeks, 100 links got indexed, 200 were not. I tried lindexed and it didn't help with indexing, just crawling.

Bookmarking helped, i bookmarked 100 articles and 30 additional got indexed and i moved from 9 to 5 for a pretty competitive keyword.

This is not really different to what I said...

You're talking about a single blast, or maybe a few. My data was averaged over hundreds of blasts. I had single case results that wildly fluctuated, but the average was the results I posted above.

Increasing indexation speed on articles now is usually counterproductive, as on average you end up with less links overall than if you'd let them self index. You're right that forced crawling makes very little difference to indexation.

Google is placing less and less value on new links all the time. Until they've aged a little, they're harder than ever to get indexed. Simply waiting for them to age makes it much easier.
 
Do you guys do AMR blast everyday or weekly? Will that affect your link velocity?
 
Do you guys do AMR blast everyday or weekly? Will that affect your link velocity?

We use it many times every day; but we're building across literally thousands of URL's.

Yes, of course it affects your link velocity. ALL link building affects your link velocity. If you mean does it affect it negatively, then no - not for us.

Over-blasting to limited URL's could cause you a lot of problems - but it's all about the pattren you've built in the past. And this is the case with all submission tools. The point of monitoring link velocity is to avoid huge swings/changes.

The great thing about regular blasting across a wide range or URL's id the constant background 'link noice' you're generating; which helps dampen the %change of any aggressive link building you do.
 
Last edited:
I think one of my sites got the SERP penalty because of using AMR on it. Was on page 2 now its nowhere to be found.
 
I think one of my sites got the SERP penalty because of using AMR on it. Was on page 2 now its nowhere to be found.

It had nothing to do with the tool. It was the technique, strategy or content you operated the tool with.

AMR is a weapon; a machine gun if you like. Don't point it at something without undertanding what happens when you pull the trigger.

Don't blame tools when it's you that's operating them!
 
It had nothing to do with the tool. It was the technique, strategy or content you operated the tool with.

AMR is a weapon; a machine gun if you like. Don't point it at something without undertanding what happens when you pull the trigger.

Don't blame tools when it's you that's operating them!

It worked well the other times I used it the same way. People say there is nothing you can do to screw up other peoples sites but I think its obvious that there is. All you need to do is use link blasting tools on them IMO.
 
Is this a yearly 97$ or is this a one off? I am stuck as my copy is no longer working...?
 
It worked well the other times I used it the same way. People say there is nothing you can do to screw up other peoples sites but I think its obvious that there is. All you need to do is use link blasting tools on them IMO.

I understand what you're saying, but that's also like saying I shot 6 rounds into a crowd and it didn't kill anyone last time. In SEO, more is not always better. Strategy is SO much more important than volume in most scenarios. If volume is necessary then a site needs to be prep'd over time.

And yes... You can damage other people's rankings by blasting them from bad neighbourhoods. But it's obviously not a very ethical thing to do. And the problem is that if you do it to the wrong site and they decide to go to a specialist lawyer and they trace you back through, then you could very well face criminal damage charges, as it's digital vandalism.

Is this a yearly 97$ or is this a one off? I am stuck as my copy is no longer working...?

It works fine. Latest version 1.0.0.4. I stuck with 1.0.0.3. As I have reports that the newest version randomises categories uncontrollable. But I haven't had time to test this yet. Just update your copy.
 
Thanks for your excellent observations and test results. AMR is one of the few tools I've bought that I can say I am HAPPY with the purchase but there's so many different ways to use it... I am always looking for the most efficient.
 
Hey mate, thanks for the post

1. what's your experience with continually blasting the same directories to one money site?

2. how important is the new ip for every blast in terms of higher success rate
 
Check out our new Article Auto Splicer & Spinner...

This can really rocket your AMR productivity, by opening up loads of instant spun content!

http://www.blackhatworld.com/blackhat-seo/buy-sell-services/374181-ubertoolz-com-incredible-new-search-engine-optimization-marketing-unique-content-creation-toolset-live.html#post3620625
 
Guys

With this years Panda-Fest, all the talk now is on indexing, and how much harder it's got...

I've run some stats from a section of AMR runs over the last 90 days (based on a slice of 3 new submissions per day, 5 days per week, 550-850 dir's, with NO 2nd/3rd tier links or pings/RSS/indexers/BMs/etc. to help them index), and it shows some interesting results.

Indexing is much slower than before as expected, but it's still consistently climbing.

With the huge slow-down, I'd expected a massive drop-off in overall indexing, but after 60-90 days, I'm still seeing some pretty good (for post-panda anyway) indexing rates.

After 2 weeks I averaged 32 indexed links (not great - I remember the days when it wpuld be 400+ by 2 weeks!)

After 1 month, it was around 64 indexed links.

After 2 months, it had climbed to around 93 indexed links.

After 3 months, most were showing 100-130 indexed links.

That's a pretty flat-line growth; and FAR better than I'd expected.

So, although the days of massive and fast indexing with AMR, are over, I have to say that I'm happy with 100-130 indexed links from each run over 3 months. That's a nice natural growth for my properties. And if you're doing 3-4 per day, then thats 400-500 indexed links per day over time.

Recently, we've been trying EVERYTHING to increase indexing rates, and the only real success seems to be from non-spammed 2.0's. Pinging/RSS feeds and services don't really seem to cut the mustard anymore. AMR > AMR doesn't increase the speed (you wouldn't really expect it to - based on the above results,) bookmarking isn't really helping either.

I wonder now if it's better to accept the new growth rates, and just get on with it; rather than spending a fortune in time/effort and money to get the links indexed quicker?

...I suppose it depends on your strategy. We have hundred and hundreds of sites that are all in it for the long-haul, so I don't care if it takes a little longer - as long as the asset is protected and maturing. If I bring a new domain online - I don't expect any results for the first 6 months (it will get some - but I don't expect anything from it.)

I think that since Panda, many BH's need to rethink their AMR strategy and while using BH methods, focus more on white/grey hat assets for longevity.

Of course, manual 2.0's have become the hot & fast indexing item now. And this is the area we're pushing into the hardest.

I also have to qualify all these results by saying that the content, titles and resources are MASSIVELY spun and highly unique, and the submissions were across hundreds of pages and domains - so ZERO footprint. Don't expect good results with mediocre spinning!

Comments/Questions?!

Im actually thinking of purchasing AMR to blast away on my projects ( im very new to the IM scene and i would like to experiment the crazy way ). Thank you for your effort in giving valuable information regarding the current 'efficiency' (or lack of) of AMR submissions. At least when i buy the program, i will not get frustrated because there is a general decreases in the indexing rate of amr blast. Its nice to be reminded that the goal is always stable growth (long term) rather than dancing like crazy all the time. :)
 
Back
Top