AI is going to kill the blogger

Join the hype. Use AI to generate content faster.

Wild idea: Why not use both? Have AI do the initial draft or gather ideas and keywords for you. Then the experts step in to add some soul and technical expertise to the article. This reduces the workload for you and your writers while still keeping the human touch in your blog.

Nerva said:

If ChatGPT can produce quality content for your blog with no human touch/verification, your niche is simply too simple. Congrats, you hit the jackpot! No need for human writers anymore!

Furthermore, if you’re used to hiring writers who simply regurgitate content, ChatGPT can be a great, cheaper alternative. Otherwise, stick with experts, or at least pay experts to verify AI content for you.

Click to expand...

This.

Plus, use it to enhance your work.
Increase output, verification, diversification of articles/content.

Nt1

Technologies are always developing so the best way is to adapt, I think blogging sustained in the future.

Yes Almost AI killed.

Check this new AI site: https://openai.com/.
If you want to know solutions or information whatever it is you can get there.
It gives simple and easy to understanding answers like a blogger.

Lets be honest here, do your readers care how well an article is written on your website?

So long as the aren't any spelling mistakes and the grammar is okay it doesn't really matter.

I have used software, written my own and paid someone else, which ones ranked the highest?
Shockingly it was mine and the software.
These paid writers all write in a specific way and you can spot them, usually the grammar isn't that good.

For the most part your articles should be about solving something with a redirection onto something else.
I hate websites where the content is just fluff and tells me nothing, I am usually there because I need to know something.

You should always focus on the reader and not the content!

TheSplinter said:

I disagree the quality is good. Chatgpt is very good at talking a lot without saying much. It talks a lot and used pretty words, but the substance isn't there. It's just fillers. Words that take you nowhere. Maybe if the article is simple enough, depending on the niche, it might do a good work, but i've been presented with plenty of content from Chatgpt that it is garbage. It sounds very good, but then i realize it didn't really say anything.

Click to expand...

If that is your experience, trust me, you have not had a "proper" conversation with it. That type of answers is maybe the first couple ones. Dig with it a little deeper and keep refining and you'd be pleasantly or maybe frighteningly surprised.

I agree.

If you do the research upfront and use good prompts, AI produces better content than most writers. It's also way more versatile than any writer.

Just changing a few words in the prompt can completely change the style of the article. Don't like the first version? Completely rewrite the article in a few seconds using a totally different voice.

And all this costs a few cents. In terms of value for money, it's unbeatable.

I learnt about a term.. called hybrid

why not do both??

I must admit I haven't used Chatgpt, is it any good?
Something else for me to try, I think.
I lost all my software when my old Acer laptop crashed and went up in smoke, literally.

pitbully said:

No, this isn't another "AI is going to kill SEO" post. But that's irrelevant because AI is going to kill blogging whether search engines die or not.

I've been building an authority site and my goal was to have the highest quality articles possible, rather than going the AI-written content route. I spent a lot of time searching for the best article writers and these writers did not come cheap. I even managed to find two professional writers who were also experts in my niche. They are the cream of the crop, as far as writers in my niche go, and the price they charge reflects that.

I got about 80 articles deep into my project when I started to realize how many people are now using AI software, ChatGPT etc. to write their articles. For a minute I thought I was high and mighty, riding my high horse into the sunset of quality content that could only be written by an expert human writer.

Then, as someone who had never used ChatGPT before, I wrote an article in my niche using ChatGPT. My conclusion? The quality of the article was almost as good as what I'm paying legitimate experts top dollar for.

Could this have something to do with my niche not being very technical, and therefore being moderately easy for AI to mimic the writing of a legitimate expert? Possibly. But if you're making blogs with human-written content and you believe that AI-written content can't compete with yours, or won't soon be able to, you and your high horse are in for a rude awakening.

And if you think the fact that every blogger will soon be writing their content with AI isn't going to inevitably devalue all written content online, I would have to say you're ignorant like I was up until a couple hours ago.

Click to expand...

IA is going to kill tousand of job, we have to innovate as every time in internet does

I read somewhere that bot generated content does not lead to good rankings. Is it true?

Can't wait to see the trend going down with the time. How far it can go? Until people has that interest of using it and once it is reached to a level, it will stop anyways. Remember, there are many things AI's can't really replace from humans and that is emotions. They can just write up scrambled blogs, they cant add spices to it. It wont last for long.

DevMask said:

You know what's worst.

You hire writers. You are happy with the quality. Pay a good amount. Later realize it is just AI generated!

Click to expand...

I experienced this with a writer recently. It wasn't a good feeling for me.

pitbully said:

No, this isn't another "AI is going to kill SEO" post. But that's irrelevant because AI is going to kill blogging whether search engines die or not.

I've been building an authority site and my goal was to have the highest quality articles possible, rather than going the AI-written content route. I spent a lot of time searching for the best article writers and these writers did not come cheap. I even managed to find two professional writers who were also experts in my niche. They are the cream of the crop, as far as writers in my niche go, and the price they charge reflects that.

I got about 80 articles deep into my project when I started to realize how many people are now using AI software, ChatGPT etc. to write their articles. For a minute I thought I was high and mighty, riding my high horse into the sunset of quality content that could only be written by an expert human writer.

Then, as someone who had never used ChatGPT before, I wrote an article in my niche using ChatGPT. My conclusion? The quality of the article was almost as good as what I'm paying legitimate experts top dollar for.

Could this have something to do with my niche not being very technical, and therefore being moderately easy for AI to mimic the writing of a legitimate expert? Possibly. But if you're making blogs with human-written content and you believe that AI-written content can't compete with yours, or won't soon be able to, you and your high horse are in for a rude awakening.

And if you think the fact that every blogger will soon be writing their content with AI isn't going to inevitably devalue all written content online, I would have to say you're ignorant like I was up until a couple hours ago.

Click to expand...

You were already paying for ai. "legitimate experts" have been using ai for years.

Ai never can kill bloggers.because it does not create anything new and if we have no bloggers,then these tools gonna be useless

pitbully said:

Adapting to using AI-written content will only help temporarily.

It's only a matter of time before the people who read blogs become people who realize they can cut you out of the loop and ask the chatbot themselves.

Click to expand...

Indeed, I don't see any chance in the long term. especially when i realize those chatbot just appeared recently and they are keep developing

AI content can be detected by google

Anne-Maree said:

AI content can be detected by google

Click to expand...

You can be right. I also keep getting this feeling that Google can detect AI-generated content.

People not realizing that what the readers want. Instead of going with the assumptions of Human Written or Human Contexted by AI, we forget to claim or tell the facts and genuineness of the use case we are trying to explain. On the Internet these days, millions of contents were generated in a daily basis inclusive of multiple languages for 1000's niches.

When you compare the engagement rate vs the quality routinely, in most of the situations 85% of information were dumped for no cause, so it won't be helpful or effective to readers. That 85% of the contents are neither directed to solve any cause nor make real value. In reality, ground, if a group of people tells A is called to be B from 2023 one day, 10 days, and continued for the next 1000 days, then A will be called B and the A is already devalued.

There are 7000+ languages being spoken in this era we are living, and the diversification element is varied by enormous in numbers. On a broader classification by taking most speaking languages, from English to Spanish to Chinese, Hindi, French and etc., this too brings 100's of variations in dialects, vocabulary, tone, cultural differences, and following by many factors.

Sometimes being in the content-engaging industry it's hard digesting to accept these facts because our focus relies on the number of visits and ranking vs how to deliver it intensively.

AI will be a game changer for NLP (Natural Language Processing) to engage users reading native content to the maximum, and also to validate the truth and facts. Language awakening is already happening everywhere with the help of AI, digital content is produced both in video and text formats; If you see the advantage and quality nature of AI facts, you will swim across other than arguing on blinds.