AI generated content ?

I'm adding my own opinions. If I want to generate something about a book, I add "tell this character is not insteresting", "the story is too long", stuff like that.
To me, the article had to tell something other way it would repeat what you can already find on the Internet.
I don't think Google bans AI directly but people are not interested in "copy/past".
 
I'm adding my own opinions. If I want to generate something about a book, I add "tell this character is not insteresting", "the story is too long", stuff like that.
To me, the article had to tell something other way it would repeat what you can already find on the Internet.
I don't think Google bans AI directly but people are not interested in "copy/past".
I agree and add that, in my opinion, it depends on the niche. I have some sites that deal with video games written in AI and the articles are written much better with AI than those I wrote, wasting a lot of time and the quality it's better with AI then manually.
However, it depends on the niche, some things absolutely require the "human" touch, others absolutely do not. If you have a cooking site, game hacks, weight loss guides etc. the human touch is useless.
If you have a website that reviews movies obviously the human touch is essential.
I don't think Google bans AI, there is no algorithm that can detect whether words are human or not.
 
AI-generated content needs to meet the audience’s quality standards and provide unique insights, so I think quality and relevance are the most important points.
 
It looks fine at first glance, but the AI is actually very bad at writing with boring, repetitive patterns. Furthermore, sometimes they misspell words or write wrong information.
 
Hello !
I posted some articles with curated data and I used ChatGPT to write for me. In my opinion, it's informative and useful. It seems to be indexed/positioned quite normally compared with my "human content".
I would like to know what's your experience with full AI content generated text on a website.
Did you encounter any problems working like that ?
Thanks !
AI content is not good for long run so avoid it if your vision is long term . For rank and bank sites, this might still work.
 
I think when you generate any content with AI, before publishing you make sure that human touch readable, focus tone and after all useful to visitor.
 
Yes, AI can help me generate content quickly, saving time and energy on research and writing, but I also need to revise it.
 
The experience is very good, but what AI writes is often too straightforward and needs further modification.
 
Hello !
I posted some articles with curated data and I used ChatGPT to write for me. In my opinion, it's informative and useful. It seems to be indexed/positioned quite normally compared with my "human content".
I would like to know what's your experience with full AI content generated text on a website.
Did you encounter any problems working like that ?
Thanks !
Ai content doesn't matter but should be humanize and quality based. i personally have experienced this.
 
Hello !
I posted some articles with curated data and I used ChatGPT to write for me. In my opinion, it's informative and useful. It seems to be indexed/positioned quite normally compared with my "human content".
I would like to know what's your experience with full AI content generated text on a website.
Did you encounter any problems working like that ?
Thanks !
As long as the content's useful Google does not care as much if it is A.I. generated.
 
Well...

It's been two months since I started using AI to help me write content.
As it's a new project, it seems to work for the moment. Posts are indexed, no problem. I started to get interesting positions in SERPs too.
Fact checking, adding opinions and go deeper in your subjects is the way to go.

For those who had bad experience with AI you should probably consider adding value to your content. I also imagine some people use brutal SEO that can impact visits on their website.
 
Back
Top