AI-generated content is OFFICIALLY allowed by Google!

harran · Feb 10, 2023

No control over AI generated content, nice Google.

Thriveink · Feb 13, 2023

clickj4ck said:
Human modified AI articles = yes

Mass generated AI articles = NO

With massive edits required and the need to check accuracy and quality of content, do you think it's worthy time and efforts?

splishsplash · Feb 13, 2023

clickj4ck said:
Human modified AI articles = yes

Mass generated AI articles = NO

There's no mention of this.

You can mass generate content that's higher quality than that of human writers.

AI is far more advanced than you realize.

Rulingseo · Feb 13, 2023

Now inevitable for AI I don't know what' will going on future,

In my opinion, always demands human touch, and google will find a way in the future.

Jabbz18 · Feb 13, 2023

To be honest i reckon its always been "Allowed" per say. Even if a piece of content is generated by ai they've always said if it gives valuable info to the search term its good enough for the SERPs.

HustleTong · Feb 13, 2023

Maybe there's nothing they can do about it atm
Things could change in future

Reachere · Feb 13, 2023

Google will check for unique and informative content to index. If AI does that then google will allow it.

clickj4ck · Feb 13, 2023

splishsplash said:
There's no mention of this.

You can mass generate content that's higher quality than that of human writers.

AI is far more advanced than you realize.

Mass generated or even single generated AI content is easily noticable. The quality of mass generated content is normally poor. Please do show me one example of a site that has mass generated content better quality than native writers.

PS: I've said it before some of the AI content specially chat GPT has better quality than non-native writers. But when it comes to native writers its just not the same level unless modified by some other tools.

iEscapedTheMatrix · Feb 13, 2023

clickj4ck said:
AI is scary bro. You can literally do anything with AI and its not that advanced at the moment. By 2030 AI will be in your home in all size and shapes.

AI can copy your voice and tone, AI can mimic your face. Imagine a robot that looks like you and speaks like you but 1000x more clever than you. <-- this is the scary part for me.

However the positive part is that CHATGPT passed medical and law exam so i'm assuming you'll have a doctor and lawer at home in form of robot in few years time.

Ain't no way we're gonna be living in the Cyberpunk 2077 realm by 2030 it ain't even 2077 yet c'mon

clickj4ck · Feb 13, 2023

iEscapedTheMatrix said:
Ain't no way we're gonna be living in the Cyberpunk 2077 realm by 2030 it ain't even 2077 yet c'mon

hahaha . I feel like government will start implementing new laws on AI. david guetta used eminems voice on one of his track and social media is going crazy. Its just matter of time for government to put a cap on it.

Most probably the voice ai will be capped , so make the most out of while its open to public.

on AGP (last season 2022) they used AI to create simon's face and it looked realistic . Now can you imagine what sort of marketing people could use with AI. Creating adverts with celebrity faces to scam people off.

I dono if its possible but Youtube , facebook , instagram .... will soon start implementing AI detectors to stop people misusing it.

splishsplash · Feb 15, 2023

clickj4ck said:
Mass generated or even single generated AI content is easily noticable. The quality of mass generated content is normally poor. Please do show me one example of a site that has mass generated content better quality than native writers.

PS: I've said it before some of the AI content specially chat GPT has better quality than non-native writers. But when it comes to native writers its just not the same level unless modified by some other tools.

It wouldn't be very smart for me to share my own sites here.. Sorry. You'll have to take my word for it, but whether you do or don't doesn't really matter. You're either able to generate high quality mass content, or you're not. Knowing it exists for others don't change anything for those others.

clickj4ck · Feb 15, 2023

splishsplash said:
It wouldn't be very smart for me to share my own sites here.. Sorry. You'll have to take my word for it, but whether you do or don't doesn't really matter. You're either able to generate high quality mass content, or you're not. Knowing it exists for others don't change anything for those others.

Bro I'm not trying to argue with you but you claimed that AI mass generated content is better than human content, so I asked for some examples. Mass generated content might be better than non-native human writing but its not better than native writers.

Btw i've noticed some of the data given by CHATGPT is incorrect .

splishsplash · Feb 15, 2023

clickj4ck said:
Bro I'm not trying to argue with you but you claimed that AI mass generated content is better than human content, so I asked for some examples. Mass generated content might be better than non-native human writing but its not better than native writers.

Btw i've noticed some of the data given by CHATGPT is incorrect .

A lot of the information given by chatgpt is indeed incorrect. That's why the best mass content systems separate out the knowledge and understanding components and don't rely on the LLM for the knowledge.

Abdulrafay1986 · Feb 15, 2023

Every one is searching AI in Google i think its going to be a game changer

Stuart Sergio · Feb 16, 2023

korcho said:
Now all AI Detector businesses will die probably

May be it's possible.

vriskas · Feb 16, 2023

Thriveink said:
With massive edits required and the need to check accuracy and quality of content, do you think it's worthy time and efforts?

If you're an authority in your niche, which you ought to be, accuracy and quality checking takes 10 minutes tops. If it takes a lot of time and effort, should you really be the one writing about this?

paisawaisa · Feb 19, 2023

korcho said:
Here we are

https://developers.google.com/search/blog/2023/02/google-search-and-ai-content

They are saying that they do not mind AI content if it is useful for readers. They can tomorrow say that we have observed that AI content is seldom useful for readers and this we will punish it.

korcho · Feb 19, 2023

paisawaisa said:
They are saying that they do not mind AI content if it is useful for readers. They can tomorrow say that we have observed that AI content is seldom useful for readers and this we will punish it.

I don't think that they can change the rules just like that.

nuclearrap · Feb 19, 2023

LOL.

G finally accepted that it can not fight with AI. So it pretends like it has nothing against AI now.

Hahahaha!!!!!

George V · Feb 20, 2023

clickj4ck said:
AI is scary bro. You can literally do anything with AI and its not that advanced at the moment. By 2030 AI will be in your home in all size and shapes.

AI can copy your voice and tone, AI can mimic your face. Imagine a robot that looks like you and speaks like you but 1000x more clever than you. <-- this is the scary part for me.

However the positive part is that CHATGPT passed medical and law exam so i'm assuming you'll have a doctor and lawer at home in form of robot in few years time.

Or if you get sick and go to a hospital, a doctor who just passed his exam using ChatGPT will be operating on you.

AI-generated content is OFFICIALLY allowed by Google!

Regular Member

Junior Member

Elite Member

Elite Member

Regular Member

Elite Member

Newbie

Senior Member

Junior Member

Senior Member

Elite Member

Senior Member

Elite Member

Junior Member

Senior Member

Junior Member

Elite Member

Junior Member

Power Member

Newbie

Main Menu

Marketplace

Making Money

BlackHat World