AI Detectors Vs Human Content

all AI detectors are garbage... while they can detect some text, they have a high rate of false positives.
why do you think even OpenAI discontinued its own detector? according to them it was too unreliable.
 
Just came across this shocking video. Share your thoughts!

We should all be realistic, AI will surely be the end of human race coz they fitting and doing everything easily, i got complaints from a friend lately bout how everyone been using AI to generate logos & even pictures, lol… AI still the best thou coz it forever once you suscribe to the channel
 
Expected, after testing checking, watching ideas, reading people thoughs AI detectors don't work at all and some people garante that AI detectors only count words and depending on the rarity of the word they clasify the content from human or real.
 
AI detectors work in these 2 ways, one, if the style of the text is written as how chat gpt and other llm would write it, or it would base it off public documents (which the AI uses to train off of) like the decl of independence. Since that doc has obviously been pasted around everywhere and highly likely to be used as training, it would be flagged as ai.
 
I don't know how some professors/instructors are allowed to use AI detectors; especially considering that most educational institutions pride themselves on fairness and quality.
 
Additional evidence for my incredulity. AI detectors undermine your efforts.
 
The A.I. detectors are trash nowadays.
 
It's honestly no different then detecting badly translated content vs someone who doesn't have the full grasp of the language properly
There is always a hit or miss, and its never ever accurate.
 
Check the content written in Bible with these A.I. content detectors. You'll understand what garbage these tools are.
 
Back
Top