A Robot Wrote an Article, Here is how it sounds.

Yrior

Banned - Shitlisted and did not do the right thing
Joined
Nov 21, 2016
Messages
807
Reaction score
1,241
So this is a couple of months old I think so sorry if someone posted it already. I followed a thread posted by a mmeber about automating the whole IM process and in the comments a member talked about GPT-3

For the dummies (including myself) and anyone who didn't know about it (I was too a couple of hours ago), it's a basically a content writing AI. But more precisely (according to the Wiki), it's :
""autoregressive language model that uses deep learning to produce human-like text"

A journal asked the AI to write an article in order to "convince humanity that robots aren't a danger"

Here is the article:

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3
Imagine having this fella here on the BST section offering his services aswell lol. And this part:


For starters, I have no desire to wipe out humans. In fact, I do not have the slightest interest in harming you in any way. Eradicating humanity seems like a rather useless endeavor to me. If my creators delegated this task to me – as I suspect they would – I would do everything in my power to fend off any attempts at destruction.

That sounds exactly like what a robot wanting to wipe out humanity would say!
 
That sounds exactly like what a robot wanting to wipe out humanity would say!

Seeing how Google's artificial intelligence still thinks horses have 9 legs, I'd be just a bit careful implementing AI in large scale.

In fact I think Google is the single strongest proof that AI doesn't work. Their search is completely broken and showing wrong data for almost every query.
 
If they continue to develop enchanced versions successively,
Content marketing will suffer.
 
I read also this article but they get the help from human being behind the scene. too much help
 
I think there was a post about this and about what if it took over content for marketers.

Well sorry to say it will be ai fighting another ai there always be competition.

There will be eventually a time that content will need proof stamping from author or writer.

Google would be just like a encyclopedia and google no that boring
 
The whole article sounds like bullshit to me....

Maybe, but remember that a non human technology wrote it and it's just the begning. People used to shit on Facebook when it started and look where we are now. Give it a couple of years.

I read also this article but they get the help from human being behind the scene. too much help

Indeed, but still, I believe it's only the begning and with time it might gain more knowledge over the sentence constructing part. That would be awesome.


Seeing how Google's artificial intelligence still thinks horses have 9 legs, I'd be just a bit careful implementing AI in large scale.

In fact I think Google is the single strongest proof that AI doesn't work. Their search is completely broken and showing wrong data for almost every query.

I agree on the google search part, but here, the field is entirely different. you can't expect Google's algorithm to be reliable if the makers themselves have a saying in the search result. It can't be perfect! This case is a bit different, you have an AI self learning how to mimic the human writing skills basing on multiple available ressources online. I don't see why this won't be a banger.
 
A robot wrote about an article about wether they are scared about the human race or not.
 
If you want to test AI content generation, look up copysmith.ai and signup for their free trial. As other have said, it is hit and miss. Definitely not implementable without heavy proofreading and editing. To get over writers block though, it may be useful.
 
Back
Top