301 redirect or just backlinks?

sgsgsg2323

Regular Member

Jan 20, 2021

273

142

• Mar 25, 2023

• #1

Wondering which one is better.

301 redirect all high af quality backlinks to my authority site

OR

build blog on it and just do backlinks to my authority site?

DR of backlinks are 80-95 some are nytimes huffpost and dailymail.

which one would you do?!

 

Guestwriting

Elite Member

Jr. VIP

Jul 30, 2012

7,726

1,502

• Mar 25, 2023

• #2

It would be a good idea to do both. A 301 redirect will pass link juice to your website, while a blog and backlinks will increase targeted traffic. It's ultimately up to you to decide which approach is best for your website.

 

tazarbm

Elite Member

Executive VIP

Jr. VIP

Oct 28, 2020

11,662

14,619

• Mar 25, 2023

• #3

I don't think that I understand you to be honest...

The backlinks from NY Times and Daily Mail point to where exactly?? Because if they already point to your "authority site" you don't need to do anything else because you're already reaping the rewards of those links.

Now, if those links point to another site that you own but which you don't care about (which is what I'm understanding from your wording, but which I could misinterpret since your wording is so ambiguous) then yes, you would have to 301 the URL of the page that the links from NYT and DM point to, to your authority site.

So, which one is it?

 

SamSanesra

Senior Member

Jun 7, 2020

974

78

• Mar 26, 2023

• #4

Both options are valuable. Redirecting high-quality backlinks to your authority site can improve its authority and search engine rankings. Building a blog on a high-quality domain and using it to create backlinks can also be effective for improving your site's authority and attracting traffic.

---

Premium Responsive Website Design and Development - Investing in Excellence

Off-Page SEO Backlinks DA 50 Plus PBNs | Profile Backlinks | Web 2.0 and many more

【20% OFF】DA 50+ PBN (PRIVATE BLOG NETWORK)US Domains General Domains UK Domains DO FOLLOW BACKLINKS

 

Black Belt Spodermen

Elite Member

Jan 18, 2016

2,803

1,681

• Mar 26, 2023

• #5

I would personally maintain both blogs separately.

 

masterweb2

Junior Member

Jun 4, 2021

186

67

• Sep 22, 2023

• #6

hello this is my question too , what if 301 backlinks are from Powerful websites like nytimes , forbes and ... but they are no relevance ? what is best strategy to use them point few on money sites or point to pbn then money site ?

 

T

titodez

Regular Member

Jul 23, 2021

478

184

• Sep 22, 2023

• #7

If your first site isn t penalise do a 301. Most effective solution. 1 backlink more wont make a Big different

 

Street Fighter

Elite Member

Jr. VIP

Aug 4, 2015

6,069

811

• Sep 23, 2023

• #8

sgsgsg2323 said:

Wondering which one is better.

301 redirect all high af quality backlinks to my authority site

OR

build blog on it and just do backlinks to my authority site?

DR of backlinks are 80-95 some are nytimes huffpost and dailymail.

which one would you do?!

Click to expand...

Consider both options a 301 redirect boosts link power while blogging and backlinks attract targeted traffic. Choose what fits your website best.

 

S

snowjon

Newbie

Sep 1, 2023

27

8

• Sep 28, 2023

• #9

I would suggest both 301,blogging and Backlinks..

 

M

metaflex

Junior Member

Dec 18, 2021

107

38

• Sep 28, 2023

• #10

Really depends on the situation.
I wouldn't be too quick to 301 a site as it can be monetized as well.

 

milhan SEO

Newbie

Sep 12, 2023

30

10

• Sep 28, 2023

• #11

Option 1 (301 Redirects): Pros - Quick authority transfer, time-saving. Cons - Risk of penalties, and loss of content relevance.
Option 2 (Build Blogs): Pros - Maintains content relevance, and diversifies backlinks. Cons - Time-consuming, not guaranteed success.
Consider a hybrid approach for a balanced strategy, and adhere to SEO guidelines.