fmartin
Junior Member
- Jan 29, 2014
- 115
- 40
Hello,
This thread is not about 301 redirecting penality or anything related to penality.
This is about trying to figure HOW (fluid flow) is being transfered.
I mean:
Let s say $old_site have 3 BL:
1st: very low quality bl (dup content, deep internet, bad citation & trust, spammy link farm)
2nd: average quality bl
3rd: good quality bl, from autoritative site, ontopic & relevant. Good citation & trust.
Ok, let s say gg discover/crawl them all ( 3 bl) the same day.
Now, 1 week later, i do a 301 redirect to $new_site (fresh, no BL).
I was wondering if all backlink info (juice, profile... to define) was transfered in ONE SHOT, OR, progressively.
So two scenarios:
Scenario 1: 301 instant.
TIME 0: About $old_site: , google know 3 BL
TIME 0: About $new_site: , google know 0 BL
TIME 1: About $old_site: , google know 0 BL
TIME 1: About $new_site: , google know 3 BL
Scenario 2: 301 transfer progressiv.
TIME 0: About $old_site: , google know 3 BL
TIME 0: About $new_site: , google know 0 BL
TIME 1: About $old_site: , google know 2 BL
TIME 1: About $new_site: , google know 1 BL
TIME 2: About $old_site: , google know 1 BL
TIME 2: About $new_site: , google know 2 BL
TIME 3: About $old_site: , google know 0 BL
TIME 3: About $new_site: , google know 3 BL
In that case, transfert is somewhat progressive.
In that specific case, the burning question would be , is there a "order" in flow. Ex: good juice goes first?.
theory:
If "good juice goes first.", that COULD explain why sometime, new_site get penalty (the one old_site was suffering about) after an variable amount of time.
I mean, if transfer is progressive, $new_site BL profile is good until bad link come and make the profile look more and more ugly, then it trigger a penalty.
In that case, it could mean that 301 should be stopped after a amount of time.... an open window to nice strategy.
Please, only speak about potential progressivity of the flow transfer. please no "i got once a site penalized..."
This thread is not about 301 redirecting penality or anything related to penality.
This is about trying to figure HOW (fluid flow) is being transfered.
I mean:
Let s say $old_site have 3 BL:
1st: very low quality bl (dup content, deep internet, bad citation & trust, spammy link farm)
2nd: average quality bl
3rd: good quality bl, from autoritative site, ontopic & relevant. Good citation & trust.
Ok, let s say gg discover/crawl them all ( 3 bl) the same day.
Now, 1 week later, i do a 301 redirect to $new_site (fresh, no BL).
I was wondering if all backlink info (juice, profile... to define) was transfered in ONE SHOT, OR, progressively.
So two scenarios:
Scenario 1: 301 instant.
TIME 0: About $old_site: , google know 3 BL
TIME 0: About $new_site: , google know 0 BL
TIME 1: About $old_site: , google know 0 BL
TIME 1: About $new_site: , google know 3 BL
Scenario 2: 301 transfer progressiv.
TIME 0: About $old_site: , google know 3 BL
TIME 0: About $new_site: , google know 0 BL
TIME 1: About $old_site: , google know 2 BL
TIME 1: About $new_site: , google know 1 BL
TIME 2: About $old_site: , google know 1 BL
TIME 2: About $new_site: , google know 2 BL
TIME 3: About $old_site: , google know 0 BL
TIME 3: About $new_site: , google know 3 BL
In that case, transfert is somewhat progressive.
In that specific case, the burning question would be , is there a "order" in flow. Ex: good juice goes first?.
theory:
If "good juice goes first.", that COULD explain why sometime, new_site get penalty (the one old_site was suffering about) after an variable amount of time.
I mean, if transfer is progressive, $new_site BL profile is good until bad link come and make the profile look more and more ugly, then it trigger a penalty.
In that case, it could mean that 301 should be stopped after a amount of time.... an open window to nice strategy.
Please, only speak about potential progressivity of the flow transfer. please no "i got once a site penalized..."