[2024 BHW Indexer Study - Part 2]

Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertise on BHW
As a long-time customer of this service - I confirm! It helps a lot to push various PBN sites into the index. I wish you success!
 
Steptoe, thanks for a good study.

Have you been checking the referrer / canonical data in GSC? I noticed that some of the indexing services drag Googlebot quite quickly but after that you can encounter backlinks to your website from irrelevant pages without content or even worse - Google decides that the referring page was canonical and doesn't index yours.
 
Cool thread. Another member did a similar test on their YT a while back with similar results. He put me onto SpeedyIndex.
 
Try speedyindex service from their telegram account and I am satisfied with results. Links are indexing fast, as they said.
 
iliag said:
Steptoe, thanks for a good study.

Have you been checking the referrer / canonical data in GSC? I noticed that some of the indexing services drag Googlebot quite quickly but after that you can encounter backlinks to your website from irrelevant pages without content or even worse - Google decides that the referring page was canonical and doesn't index yours.
Click to expand...
This can happen periodically with all indexing services, if they buy up expired domains for indexing and some domains suddenly have still high ranking, then they drag canonical to themselves. But Google has only had this option in place for a couple months, they haven't done this before, and they are aware of the problem and are addressing it now.

But the services, of course, still better on their indexing domains to use together with 301 and header: X-Robots-Tag: noindex, follow
To avoid this bug from Google.

P.S>
By the way, we recently conducted a test so Google bug when it says in the console that the wrong canonical page is selected and points to another site completely, not yours. We managed to determine in the test what exactly affects its choice.
 
GoogSEO said:
This can happen periodically with all indexing services, if they buy up expired domains for indexing and some domains suddenly have still high ranking, then they drag canonical to themselves. But Google has only had this option in place for a couple months, they haven't done this before, and they are aware of the problem and are addressing it now.

But the services, of course, still better on their indexing domains to use together with 301 and header: X-Robots-Tag: noindex, follow
To avoid this bug from Google.

P.S>
By the way, we recently conducted a test so Google bug when it says in the console that the wrong canonical page is selected and points to another site completely, not yours. We managed to determine in the test what exactly affects its choice.
Click to expand...

Thanks, now it's quite clear.

It would be very interesting to know your test results if possible. I am thinking to use indexing services on a large scale but I am very concerned about how it might affect SEO rankings.
 
iliag said:
Steptoe, thanks for a good study.

Have you been checking the referrer / canonical data in GSC? I noticed that some of the indexing services drag Googlebot quite quickly but after that you can encounter backlinks to your website from irrelevant pages without content or even worse - Google decides that the referring page was canonical and doesn't index yours.
Click to expand...
You mean from the domains that some services use for their 301 redirects? I haven't been tracking them per se (though I have a nice list of domains that they used collated, for me to spy on later) but it's something I could think of tracking in the next iteration of the study.

GoogSEO said:
This can happen periodically with all indexing services, if they buy up expired domains for indexing and some domains suddenly have still high ranking, then they drag canonical to themselves. But Google has only had this option in place for a couple months, they haven't done this before, and they are aware of the problem and are addressing it now.

But the services, of course, still better on their indexing domains to use together with 301 and header: X-Robots-Tag: noindex, follow
To avoid this bug from Google.

P.S>
By the way, we recently conducted a test so Google bug when it says in the console that the wrong canonical page is selected and points to another site completely, not yours. We managed to determine in the test what exactly affects its choice.
Click to expand...
There are at least a couple of services that need to follow your advice regarding that http header!
 
Steptoe said:
You mean from the domains that some services use for their 301 redirects? I haven't been tracking them per se (though I have a nice list of domains that they used collated, for me to spy on later) but it's something I could think of tracking in the next iteration of the study.
Click to expand...

Thanks, that would be nice.
 
iliag said:
Thanks, now it's quite clear.

It would be very interesting to know your test results if possible. I am thinking to use indexing services on a large scale but I am very concerned about how it might affect SEO rankings.
Click to expand...
In very large quantities, you will not have time to feel the problems from indexing services, the anti-dorway algorithm will punish you sooner.
And in normal quantities there are no problems in using indexing services.
 
GoogSEO said:
In very large quantities, you will not have time to feel the problems from indexing services, the anti-dorway algorithm will punish you sooner.
And in normal quantities there are no problems in using indexing services.
Click to expand...

Okay, I will give it a chance. Thanks.
 
Schatzboot said:
I'm going to contact SpeedyIndex to ask for a miracle, but my expectations are low.
Click to expand...
Of all the indexers I tried so far, this one worked just fine. Give it a try. The only issue is about Telegram. But they have an API where you can do everything programmatically even generate invoices. I never tested their API though, just used Telegram.
 
Congratz to SpeedyIndex
If OP is biased and promoting Lindexing, then he is the worst marketer I have ever seen, lmao
Tbh, this comparison does not seem fishy or biased, fair enough
 
Kudos for this research and review! I just tried the first of your list, indexingexpert, and got satisfactory results in 24 hours with a brand new website. So thank you, your list helped me!
 
Hi @Steptoe,

Sorry i'm still new in seo so i dont really understand how to read the report. Report for Indexing Expert domain #3 1st googlebot visit is 9 hours, 19 minutes but in the column 1d to 14d all is x. my question is :
1. 1st googlebot visit is the first time google index the page, isnt it?

2. if the answer for point 1 is yes, then what is the check mark in column means?
 
This thread looks like a masked promotion....the surce is trust me bro and some ✅
 
greentomato said:
Hi @Steptoe,

Sorry i'm still new in seo so i dont really understand how to read the report. Report for Indexing Expert domain #3 1st googlebot visit is 9 hours, 19 minutes but in the column 1d to 14d all is x. my question is :
1. 1st googlebot visit is the first time google index the page, isnt it?

2. if the answer for point 1 is yes, then what is the check mark in column means?
Click to expand...
A visit from googlebot does not always mean that the page will be indexed and sometimes the quality of the donor(googlebot source from service) affects this.
 
Thanks for sharing this update....great effort and valuable insights!
 
Advertise on BHW
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sign up now!

Main Menu

Home Main Forum List Black Hat SEO White Hat SEO BHW Newbie Guide Blogging Black Hat Tools Social Media Downloads

Marketplace

Account Selling Content / Copywriting EBooks / Methods Hosting Misc Proxies For Sale SEO - Link building SEO - Packages Social Media Social Media - Panels Web Design More

Making Money

Affiliate Programs Hire a Freelancer IM Journeys Making Money Pay Per Click Site Flipping Want to Buy

BlackHat World

Dispute Resolution Forum Suggestions & Feedback Introductions Lounge
Back
Top