100k PBN using blogspot does it worth it?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Deleted member 1203133
  • Start date Start date
D

Deleted member 1203133

Guest
Holla amigos, does PBN links work nowadays on ranking? i wonder if i created like about 100k blogspot blogs with random scrapped content related to my main domain content and then give a do-follow backlinks to my main domain from these blogs, will it helps to rank faster? i mean does PBN works or have been taken down already on last Big G updates?
 
that will be such a huge footprint,
I've seen a couple of websites ranking with such a tactic (mainly using Blogspot only), but it will be such a big risk
you can go with web 2.0s using rankerx, it should be better
 
that will be such a huge footprint,
I've seen a couple of websites ranking with such a tactic (mainly using Blogspot only), but it will be such a big risk
you can go with web 2.0s using rankerx, it should be better
Currently subdomain of web2.0 don’t have the karam of main domain
I don’t think it still works well
 
Holla amigos, does PBN links work nowadays on ranking? i wonder if i created like about 100k blogspot blogs with random scrapped content related to my main domain content and then give a do-follow backlinks to my main domain from these blogs, will it helps to rank faster? i mean does PBN works or have been taken down already on last Big G updates?


I suggest to going down the route of creating a google stack instead of tons of links from blogpost

take a look at "rhinoplasty Plano " you will see a google stack ranked at the top 5. reverse engineer it.

also check Austin Seo Consultant

a good thread to read: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/g-silos-youtube-backlinks-get-rank-1.1045056/#post-11238156
 
that will be such a huge footprint,
I've seen a couple of websites ranking with such a tactic (mainly using Blogspot only), but it will be such a big risk
you can go with web 2.0s using rankerx, it should be better
huuum yeah it is kind of stupid thing to do and putting my website into high risk but as you said me too i saw many created-4-money blogs that ranking fucking good using this tactic and they've been running for a while even thought they use spin contents on their money website !
 
Last edited by a moderator:
huuum yeah it is kind of stupid thing to do and putting my website in high risk but as you said i am too saw many created-4-money blogs that ranking fucking good using this tactic and they've been running for a while even thought they use spin contents on their money website !
you can always try,
it's worth the shot and will give you some good experience in both cases,
but don't go for if you're in such a tight budget
 
Currently subdomain of web2.0 don’t have the karam of main domain
I don’t think it still works well
I don't think a web 2.0 will have the same power such a pbn of course,
but they do work for most of the niches and they are x100 cheaper than PBNs
 
As far as I tried, PBN proves to be good method to build links!!
 
WIthout any qualm,PBN helps in ranking.
But as you said, building 100k posts with scraped content with do follow links leaves amass footprint for Big 'G'.

Think of PBN to build links, but not in the way you prefer in your question.

Quality PBN links that looks natural, with handwritten high quality content with do-follo and no-follow be 50-50 helps you in great way in ranking.

Think of it and move.

SEO is a big sea, dont dive deep without enough knowledge or precautions.

Good luck
 
Imagine having to deal with 100k blogspot blogs... when a couple of decent PBNs would do better work.
 
I suggest to going down the route of creating a google stack instead of tons of links from blogpost

take a look at "rhinoplasty Plano " you will see a google stack ranked at the top 5. reverse engineer it.

also check Austin Seo Consultant

a good thread to read: https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/g-silos-youtube-backlinks-get-rank-1.1045056/#post-11238156
I kow its working. Sometimes I see similar "sites" even with adsense monetization, they are so old and for some keywords they are quite in the top. BUT there is a gap. I can't index them.
 
Back
Top