1,286 People Arrested For FB and Twitter Comments

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whether you agree with him burning a poppy or not, freedom of speech/expression is a muscle that should be exercised, otherwise we will lose it forever. What his actions have done though, and those of the twitter prosecutions, is shed light on how our government are trying to limit free speech.
 
Last edited:
Are you guys seriously pissed off by this? Freedom of speech is bad news, you're basically saying terrorists have the freedom to organize terror attacks on twitter and facebook, that's bullshit. This kind of casual attitude towards terrorists is what caused 9/11, we need to stop them before they blow up a city, not punish them after they've done it. If you're a good person with nothing to hide you should be happy that the goverment is taking action against terrorists unlike before.
 
Are you guys seriously pissed off by this? Freedom of speech is bad news, you're basically saying terrorists have the freedom to organize terror attacks on twitter and facebook, that's bullshit. This kind of casual attitude towards terrorists is what caused 9/11, we need to stop them before they blow up a city, not punish them after they've done it. If you're a good person with nothing to hide you should be happy that the goverment is taking action against terrorists unlike before.

The threat of terrorism is greatly exaggerated. You are 11,000 times more likely to die from an airplane accident than you are to die from an airplane related act of terror.
 
Are you guys seriously pissed off by this? Freedom of speech is bad news, you're basically saying terrorists have the freedom to organize terror attacks on twitter and facebook, that's bullshit. This kind of casual attitude towards terrorists is what caused 9/11,

So many fallacies, I do not know where to begin. Organizing terror attacks and killing is already covered by other aspects of the law. Burning symbolic poppies, flags or wearing a flag as a diaper (see people vs Larry Flynt) has nothing to do with it. If you have a hard time understanding this, why don't you move to Saudi Arabia to be with your brethren.

And no, freedom of speech did not cause 9/11. That was a clash between fundamentalism and western values, of which freedom of speech is one. Do you get it now?
 
some more reasons to keep off facebook...


Over 25% of Colleges Now Prying Into High Schoolers' Facebook Profiles

According to a recent Kaplan Test Prep survey, which polled 350
admissions officers from colleges all over the country, over 25 percent
said they had looked up applicants on Facebook and Google.

Many high school students are now taking steps that were common place among
older college students entering the job market: they're changing their names
on Facebook, or they are ditching the site altogether.

The same Kaplan survey found that 15 percent of schools have a rigid
social media policy when it comes to admissions. That may not seem like
a lot, but compared to the college admissions climate even just a few
short years ago, it accounts for many schools.

According to Nancy McDuff, associate vice president for admissions and
enrollment management at the University of Georgia, students open
themselves up to inquiries from schools when they put themselves out
there online.

According to a recent Kaplan Test Prep survey, which polled 350
admissions officers from colleges all over the country, over 25%
said they had looked up applicants on Facebook and Google.

Many high school students are now taking steps that were common place among older
college students entering the job market: they're changing their names
on Facebook, or they are ditching the site altogether.

The same Kaplan survey found that 15% of schools have a rigid social media policy
when it comes to admissions. That may not seem like a lot, but compared to the
college admissions climate even just a few short years ago, it accounts for many
schools.

According to Nancy McDuff, associate vice president for admissions and
enrollment management at the University of Georgia, students open
themselves up to inquiries from schools when they put themselves out
there online.

"If a student mentions something in their application that isn't well explained,
and you're looking for more information, you may check their Facebook," she told
Time Magazine. "They're writing about themselves.

That's no different from what a guidance counselor may write about them when they
ask for someone to write a letter of recommendation."

---

Kaplan Test Prep Survey Finds That College Admissions Officers' Discovery of Online
Material Damaging to Applicants Nearly Triples in a Year


Over a Quarter of College Admissions Officers Today Include Google or Facebook in Applicant Evaluations; 35% Report Discovering Information that Negatively Impacted Prospective Students' Admissions Chances - Up from 12% Last Year

NEW YORK -- (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Results from Kaplan Test Prep's 2012 survey of college admissions officers* show that schools are increasingly discovering information on Facebook and Google that negatively impact applicants' acceptance chances.

While the percentage of admissions officers who took to Google (27%) and checked Facebook (26%) as part of the applicant review process increased slightly (20% for Google and 26% for Facebook in 2011) from last year, the percentage that said they discovered something that negatively impacted an applicant's chances of getting into the school nearly tripled - from 12% last year to 35% this year.

Offenses cited included essay plagiarism, vulgarities in blogs, alcohol consumption in photos, things that made them "wonder," and "illegal activities."

In 2008, when Kaplan began tracking this trend, only one in 10 admissions officers reported checking applicants' social networking pages.

"Social media used to basically mean Facebook. But the underlying trend we see is the increase in use of Google, which taps into a social media landscape that's proliferated to include Twitter, YouTube, Pinterest, Instagram, blogging and other platforms -- and teens today are using all of these channels," said Jeff Olson, Vice President of Data Science, Kaplan Test Prep.

"Additionally, we're seeing a growing cultural ubiquity in social media use, plus a generation that's grown up with a very fluid sense of privacy norms. In the face of all these trends, the rise in discovery of digital dirty laundry is inevitable."

Olson noted, "With regard to college admissions, the traditional application -- the essays, the letters of recommendation -- represent the polished version of an applicant, while often what's found online is a rawer version of that applicant.

Schools are philosophically divided on whether an applicant's digital trail is fair game, and the majority of admissions officers do not look beyond the submitted application, but our advice to students is to think first, Tweet later."
 
Are you guys seriously pissed off by this? Freedom of speech is bad news, you're basically saying terrorists have the freedom to organize terror attacks on twitter and facebook, that's bullshit. This kind of casual attitude towards terrorists is what caused 9/11, we need to stop them before they blow up a city, not punish them after they've done it. If you're a good person with nothing to hide you should be happy that the goverment is taking action against terrorists unlike before.

you're a moron, terrorists attacked us because the government has been bombing foreign countries that have done nothing to us, yea I'd be pretty pissed if someone bombed my country and i would make it my mission to make sure they paid, or what, you believe that they attacked us because we are "free and rich" get fucking real kid
 
In a lot of these cases it is not really bout freedom of speech.

It is about dickheads making statements to deliberately try and offend someone.

Do not confuse freedom of speech and what it stands for, with these attention-seeking idiots online who just want a minute of fame at the extent of someone else.

I couldn't give two fucks if a man gets arrested for being incredibly offensive about a murdered child.

However, yes I agree- it is a dangerous & slippery slope when you start prosecuting people over stuff like this.
 
WTF r they wasting TIme Instead of finding Big Rule Broker
Lol its funny they are giving such priority to This :asshole:
 
The original writer on this thread,whether or not one agrees with him, was making a serious contribution to discussion of freedoms. It is very sad to see that many people responding to it were unable to rise above the use of abusive language.

Serious subjects demand serious thought and mutually respectful debate, not the flinging of insults.

Having got that off my chest I'll add that the upper house of the British parliament recently voted for a review of the offensive speech legislation as they felt that debate of important issues could be restricted. Their challenge is to get the government to respond.

Sent from my mobile via Tapatalk 2
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top