Search results

Gyuman82 - what a coincidence, yesterday I found your article about this (private blog network myths) via google hehe. But I am still not convinced by the SEO hosting option, that sound very risky to me. Is there maybe a good hosting which doesnt label itself as a seo hosting company and where...

For people suggesting me to go on webhosting talk forum to find $1 hosting companies - thats what i did and its not working. Its a hit or miss game, maybe half of the hosting stops working in 2-3 weeks, is extremely slow or the up-time is very bad. Reseller package - thats not worth it...

Sorry for my ignorance, but what is a filler site? A quick google search hasnt found anything useful.

Well, the question is clear from the title :). I know that many of you will be telling me that i should host every single page on a separate hosting, but its not that easy. I tried it, but i had to go for the cheap ones and they are a major pain in the ass :(. Many of my sites are offline...

Hi, i have a car insurance website where i use a javascript calculator to compare the insurance prices. Would it be bad, if i would insert this script to more than one page? Because my visitors come to the website through the subpages and then they have to navigate to the page with the...

Shameless bump :D

Ok, i will try to redo my site. And yes, you are right, i observed other top sites and they dont have a lot of content on the homepage. And i know about the method where you use a page to be shown as the homepage, but thats what i wanted to avoid, because a simple page looks, well... simple :)...

So, here is the problem. I think, its a very good thing to have a lot of content on the homepage, i have also found this video from our beloved Matt Cutts about this - (search on youtube this term "How much content should be on a homepage?) He basically says, that its better to have more content...

With Matt Cutts of course :D i would get him drunk to get some pro tips.

Interested in a lifetime coupon too, but I am already a customer, so I am not sure if its applicable under such circumstances?

standsfield - its tempting to interlink the websites in the network but i dont do that. Because your whole network can be taken down in one hit (and thats painful if you invested a lot of money and time into it). Thats why I am buying expired domains - each domain has already enough links, i...

Its working :-), thanks for the tips. By the way, whats your opinion on creating 2 links from the same website pointed to the same website? I mean if it would bring something to add another article with another anchor text pointed to my money site from the bought domain? Or is 1 link enough?

Yes, there are lots of us here...

Ok, lets say for example my keyword is "car insurance". I will use exact match keyword on 5 websites and on the remaining 5 i will use keywords like "cheapest car insurance" "car insurance online" etc. Would that be a good solution?

Ok, thank you guys. I have gone back to the old articles and edited the keywords from naked urls to exact match keywords. I am using serpbook, so i am eager to watch the serps after this change, i will keep you informed :).

Yes, i do have other forms of backlinks too, so the exact match keywords will be "diluted" by the other links. Another question - do you think it would be wise to go back and edit the anchor text on those websites if the articles with link are already published?

1. They are mainly very good PR4 sites (with very good backlinks, absolutely no spam) 2. Uh, so I should just use only exact match keywords? Cant that be a problem?

Shameless bump...

Hi guys, so I am building my own private blog network from bought expired domains just for my one own money site. Its very demanding, because i need many hours just to add one site to the network and it costs a lot too (i have bought sites for 100 USD, every site has its own hosting etc.). So...

I have just made my first order of the Lions mane package ;). Payment sent, paypal transaction ID: ********3872817. I am looking forward to the results.