Search results

I'll be following this. I'm already working on an adsense site, but hopefully I will learn a few things :)

I've been following your thread, and I must say I am quite curious to see if your rankings will stick. I have seen many examples of others who automated all their link building and were punished for it. I have also seen the opposite happen. What makes you think your linking strategy will work in...

Thanks Matthew, but I have already watched most of your videos. Thanks a lot for making them! Scritty, I can't thank you enough for your post. It was of immense help to me. I have been building manual quality tier 1s without backlinking them, and it seems like I have made a great mistake. You...

Keep in mind that the articles' relevance to your site might be important, too

Hi. Let's say I have built 20 Web 2.0 links to my money site as tier 1 links. There are no other links to the money site or the 2.0s. I am ranking around #30 for low competition keywords. How big a difference does it make to create a tier 2+3 to my tier 1? How big of a 'jump' have you...

I'm watching the thread. It sounds like you chose a too-easy keyword for the first site. It also sounds like you won't make the same mistake again. Your bot ideas sound really interesting, by the way. Keep it up!

I'm assuming that since you need to post to lots of 2.0s, you have lots of content to put on there. Are you spinning the articles that you put on your 2.0s, or are you writing everything manually? If you spin them, how unique are they, and is it working well for you?

1) Buy a new domain 2) Start over 3) Use unique content 4) Use quality, not quantity backlinks

Are you spinning both on phrase and word level? And do you only submit spun content to your 2.0s? How is it working for you?

Thanks for the detailed answer. I am not expecting a definitive answer; I just want to see what others are doing, and what works for them. But you have a great point overall - posting a single article with nothing else is probably a bad idea, since it is obvious that the site has been made for...

Hi! I'm seeing very different opinions about Web 2.0s as tier 1s. Some people like to put just one 300-400 word article on each Web 2.0, while others put 3-4 500-word articles on each of their tier 1s. Obviously the benefit of the first option is that you can have far more tier 1s for less...

Google does NOT like spun content. It's that simple. If you want to get accepted, you should add articles that are 100% unique and hand-written. When you have more of them, try to submit another application.

I have a question: Is is really enough to put one 300-word article on each web 2.0 property? Is this not suspicious to Google? I saw a thread where another guy was advising to use 3-4 500+ word articles on each 2.0 property. In your experience, is this a waste? If I were to order your...

Getting too little sleep is bad for your productivity; in my experience it's always a bad idea :) If you need to get pages indexed, social activity can help with this. Make a Twitter/Facebook and send out messages. A good way to find longtails is to look at your competitors and see which things...

Interesting case study. Thanks for posting so consistently!

I applied with 6 articles, each with around 700 words, all 100% unique. I got approved. I'm still following your journey, by the way :)

Thanks a lot for the post - I'm doing something similar. In your opinion, for a keyword with ~2000 monthly searches, how many web 2.0s are necessary before it hits first page? Also, for a new site, is it a good idea to first make maybe 10 2.0s with just "website.com" as anchor? Then, once a...

I would really appreciate your opinion on my SEO plan :). I'm also trying to rank with Web 2.0s. I just started a new site, let's call it mysite.com. I posted 7 manually written articles, 600-800 words each. My keywords have 1k-15k searches. Now, for off-site SEO, my plan is this: First I will...

Good to see you back - be careful not to stray too far from your main area. It's a mistake I see many people do. Instead of focusing on one thing and getting good at it, they jump from method to method, making almost nothing with each before they move on. Just a tip :)

This is essentially what I'm doing. However, I'm doing it manually, writing the articles myself and creating each 2.0 myself. If the method works manually, I'll follow your tip and automate it. Thanks for the study, I'll be following it!