Search results

It sounds more like they're using PBNs and blocking them from crawlers such as AHREFS, Moz, Majestic, etc. If you try to look at the backlink profile of my money sites, you'll hardly find anything, but I assure you it's not just random luck.

Photoshop and CSS, bruh

Oh? I'd be interested to hear how you went about doing that.

The case studies I've looked at since May, and my own personal experience, suggest that it's difficult-to-impossible to rank new sites within 30 days. Sure, you can get indexed and up to about page 4 for some keywords, but page 1 doesn't seem so attainable.

I use Scrapebox, specifically the Alive Checker addon. Checking for 100s of millions of sites is definitely a tall-order, though. Maybe refine your parameters. With my modest set up, it checks a few hundred per minute.

I'm gonna make a WSO out of this method and print money!

Yes. I'm always checking the link profiles anyway, but sometimes it doesn't tell the whole story. I have picked up formerly 302ed domains in the past, that otherwise looked clean, that big G refused to index. Maybe they had manual action taken against them. Who knows. Of course, sometimes this...

This is an issue I run into frequently, and I don't risk it with these domains. As SeoElf said, if the previous SEOer let it drop, they probably did so for good reason. I know it sucks to find a legit domain with solid metrics and great backlinks, only to discover that some spammer picked it up...

What sort of a backlink was it from CNN? I have sites with CNN backlinks, and they're all do-follow. The only nofollow links on CNN that I'm aware of are in the footer.

Personally, I choose not to risk it. I used to keep a lot of project data in Google docs, but I feel safer now working in Open Office. I should probably stop working so much in Chrome as well. I don't know if Google actually hoards all this data, but if they can legally do so, they'd be stupid...

I'll add that the main reason to block moz/ahref/et all is to hide PBN links and prevent competitors from reporting them. If you're running your own PBN, this is a critical step. If you're buying links, you can only hope your service provider is taking this step. If you're not using PBNs, I...

Blocking them from crawling your money site will NOT hide your backlinks. It will only hide outgoing links on your money site. If you want to hide your backlinks, you must have control of the sites pointing to your money site. For example if you have your own PBN, you must block spiders on...

Yeah, maybe I just need to spend more time carefully searching there. I'm definitely not interested in spending $x,xxx on something that's already generating revenue, which obviously is the main purpose of Flippa. Something lean, with minimal content and minimal backlinks would be perfect, but...

Hey SEO Power, I'm big fan of your posts. I learned a lot from you in some of the PBN threads. I'm not referring to expired domains, though. I already have a scraping method I use to acquire those. One of my aforementioned niche sites is built on an exired domain with a nice backlink profile...

I'm currently building out an authority site and some niche websites, and supporting some of it with a PBN I've built. They're all fresh domains. This is an investment I expect to pay off down the road, and I understand that it's a waiting game with big G before any of this stuff ranks. I expect...

Semantics I guess, I never really thought of it as a penalty per se, but I see what you're saying. What I mean to ask is if there could be some other penalty at play, and how to determine this without GWT. Perhaps G somehow knows that I've reused content from the slapped site, even though it no...

I have a niche site that's only about 3 weeks old. The keyword has relatively low competition. I've hardly done any linkbuilding on it yet, so I'm not expecting it to rank particularly well for any terms, but I am seeing some strange things. Let's say that my main keyword is Ladies Socks. It's...

You mean that you can get away with it, not that Google allows it. If Google allowed it, you wouldn't have to redirect the link.

Check the Wayback Machine and see if the domain was previously used for something spammy. Very often you'll find that spammers (frequently Japanese for some reason) have exploited the domain already.

Why make two threads about this? The answer is no, btw.