Let everyone use AI for SEO (this is my future pink hat strategy)

Joined
Oct 28, 2026
Messages
14
Reaction score
7
I have seen hundreds of reels regarding AI will take over SEO and after watching full video i always says that it's a complete bullsh*t (never a single video has convinced me to be useful).

Why I said that let them use AI for SEO? Because as we know that SEO is a competition thing, not a to-do list, so eventually everyone using AI slop will set a bar so low for us (real SEO ball knowers) to promote our own SaaS and products like a piece of cake..

Wdy guys think of it? I know I'm sounding evil but yeah I'm soo tired of convincing everyone!!!
 
You got a point.

But this applies mostly to out-of-the-box usage of AI.

Customized approaches that are able to achieve high quality, human-like output are here to stay.

Unless AI leaves a footprint on every pixel and character it generates. For example if law starts to require it.
 
Lol, true to an extent most likely. if everyone publishes the same generic stuff quality becomes more important. The people who understand their audience and have real experience to share still have an advantage these days though.
 
Exactly, AI can speed up SEO, but it can't replace real expertise. When everyone uses the same tools, originality and strategy are what set you apart.
 
I agree! AI can make SEO more accessible and efficient, but the real advantage will come from how creatively we use it. The best strategy is to combine AI with human expertise, originality, and a strong focus on users.
 
to me AI will always complement SEO because it like a tool for me not just copy and paste of content or any other stuff
 
I was thinking the same. But sometimes AI can produce good content if we prompt it correctly. The problem is, AI can help us create content targeting what a keyword needs, but that doesn't necessarily mean we're giving people what they actually want. Producing content and building something people genuinely want will make a lot more difference than publishing thousands of keyword-targeted articles.
 
I have seen hundreds of reels regarding AI will take over SEO and after watching full video i always says that it's a complete bullsh*t (never a single video has convinced me to be useful).

Why I said that let them use AI for SEO? Because as we know that SEO is a competition thing, not a to-do list, so eventually everyone using AI slop will set a bar so low for us (real SEO ball knowers) to promote our own SaaS and products like a piece of cake..

Wdy guys think of it? I know I'm sounding evil but yeah I'm soo tired of convincing everyone!!!
Ipv, I have witnessed people so engrossed in writing articles that they do not bother to check whether it would be of any use to those searching for it. Ai does save your time, but when all the content is almost the same, then there is no quest of ranking at all. the only advantage is in knowing the niche nd not just ai.
 
AI can speed up content production, but if everyone publishes the same generic stuff, standing out becomes easier for sites with real experience and useful data. The real challenge is making something people actually want to read, not just publishing more pages.
 
I have seen hundreds of reels regarding AI will take over SEO and after watching full video i always says that it's a complete bullsh*t (never a single video has convinced me to be useful).

Why I said that let them use AI for SEO? Because as we know that SEO is a competition thing, not a to-do list, so eventually everyone using AI slop will set a bar so low for us (real SEO ball knowers) to promote our own SaaS and products like a piece of cake..

Wdy guys think of it? I know I'm sounding evil but yeah I'm soo tired of convincing everyone!!!
Yes if you know how to properly do SEO, AI will enhance and hasten that skill make your work done in half the time.
 
I have seen hundreds of reels regarding AI will take over SEO and after watching full video i always says that it's a complete bullsh*t (never a single video has convinced me to be useful).

Why I said that let them use AI for SEO? Because as we know that SEO is a competition thing, not a to-do list, so eventually everyone using AI slop will set a bar so low for us (real SEO ball knowers) to promote our own SaaS and products like a piece of cake..

Wdy guys think of it? I know I'm sounding evil but yeah I'm soo tired of convincing everyone!!!
AI will not be able to replace SEO skills, I believe.

While AI is capable of accelerating the process, it does not change the fact that strategy, intent of search, user experience, and competitive analysis decide the game.

AI is only an asset to those who can utilize it properly.
 
Honestly, I like this approach. Let everyone experiment with AI tools, but the real advantage will come from those who know how to check the output, understand search intent, and turn generic AI content into something genuinely useful.
 
I think the useful distinction is between using AI as a tool and handing it the whole decision. AI is good at drafting outlines, summarising research, checking readability, and spotting gaps in coverage. It is much weaker at knowing what a specific audience actually needs, what evidence is trustworthy, and which trade-offs matter for a particular site.

That is why the same tool produces very different results in different hands. A person who already understands search intent, page structure, and how to verify facts can use a draft as a starting point and improve it. A person who publishes the first draft unchanged usually ends up with generic wording that says little a reader could not find elsewhere.

A practical test I would use is simple: after editing, can you point to something in the page that only your experience, data, or testing could have produced? If the answer is no, the page is probably interchangeable with many others. If the answer is yes, whether it is a worked example, a comparison from real use, or a clear recommendation with its limits, then AI has sped up the work without replacing the judgement behind it.
 
I think the useful distinction is between using AI as a tool and handing it the whole decision. AI is good at drafting outlines, summarising research, checking readability, and spotting gaps in coverage. It is much weaker at knowing what a specific audience actually needs, what evidence is trustworthy, and which trade-offs matter for a particular site.

That is why the same tool produces very different results in different hands. A person who already understands search intent, page structure, and how to verify facts can use a draft as a starting point and improve it. A person who publishes the first draft unchanged usually ends up with generic wording that says little a reader could not find elsewhere.

A practical test I would use is simple: after editing, can you point to something in the page that only your experience, data, or testing could have produced? If the answer is no, the page is probably interchangeable with many others. If the answer is yes, whether it is a worked example, a comparison from real use, or a clear recommendation with its limits, then AI has sped up the work without replacing the judgement behind it.
Ok but your reply is completely irrelevant. And stop spamming comments using Ai!!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: V
Back
Top