Freelancer are creating content with AI

PBNLegends

Power Member
Jr. VIP
Joined
Apr 25, 2025
Messages
728
Reaction score
124
I wonder how many seo agencies and freelancers are creating content with AI and publishing without reading the content?

Can they back up the content on a discovery call

Like do they understand everything AI is posting on their behalf?
 
most pbn are now using 100% ai generated articles. buying links with them have gotten risky. google not only de-values the pbn post, but also URLs linking out from them, that is, the money site.
 
I can't say everyone is doing that. But if you can't explain, verify and defend what you're publishing then you probably shouldn't be publishing it at all. AI should be augmenting your expertise not replacing it.
 
Haha true. AI can write an article in minutes, but at least read it once before publishing lol. What if a client asks something about it and you have no idea?
 
Haha true. AI can write an article in minutes, but at least read it once before publishing lol. What if a client asks something about it and you have no idea?
You just read it again to have an idea xD.
 
I think relying entirely on AI-generated content for SEO is a big mistake. I tested this with a blog, and even after six months, it still wasn’t ranking on Google.
 
  • Agreed. Low-quality AI content has made cheap PBN networks way riskier for money sites. Quality control on PBN content matters more than ever now
 
I wonder how many seo agencies and freelancers are creating content with AI and publishing without reading the content?

Can they back up the content on a discovery call

Like do they understand everything AI is posting on their behalf?
I think AI is great for speeding up content creation, but for publishing without reviewing is where the problem starts. You still need to check the content and answers the users question.
 
Then tomorrow, they will be on here lamenting how their SEO is not performing and yada yada. While Ai is doing the work, no one should get so sloppy as not to glance at what it gathered in. Apart from that contributing to lower your ranking, you lose touch with your contents and your PBN.
 
Hard to put a number on how many. For the automation part, i'd stop the workflow at draft, with source data beside every factual claim and the original text beside quotes. Anything unsupported goes back for review. Scheduling should need a person approving that exact version, not just approving the topic beforehand. That gives the person on the discovery call something to explain and check, instead of trying to defend whatever the generator published overnight. Also you can get a help with decision model like typesafe
 
AI spits out factually incorrect information so many times. All these low effort AI slop 'freelancers' will get dumped by their clients sooner or later.
 
using ai not really issue for me as long as person behind it actually understands the topic.publishing something without checking can lead wrong information and makes hard to explain work when client asks questions.ai speed up process not replace the part where you actually know what you publishing.
 
Many agencies are doing this, mostly freelancers, becouse they donot have extra budget to hire a content writer.

Previously, before AI, a developer who was supposed to build a website with dummy content, is now using AI to fill the website with actual content, including the homepage, about page, other necessary pages, and few additional blogs as a gesture to make the client happy.

From this POV, even companies are doing the same thing. They are using AI to fill websites with content, most of the time without properly reviewing it or fully understanding what it says.

However, I think there is a difference between using AI to speed up content creation and blindly publishing whatever AI generates. AI can be a great assistant, but someone still needs to review the content, check the facts, and make sure it aligns with the client's business, services, and expertise.

The real test is exactly what you mentioned: can they explain the content during a discovery call? If a client asks questions about a blog post or any claim made on their website, they should be able to explain it in their own words instead of relying on AI to generate another answer.

Using AI isn't the problem. Publishing content without understanding it or taking responsibility for it is.
 
I wonder how many seo agencies and freelancers are creating content with AI and publishing without reading the content?

Can they back up the content on a discovery call

Like do they understand everything AI is posting on their behalf?
AI can handle the writing mate, but the seo expert should still know the subject. Otherwise, the clients questions become the real content audit.
 
Many agencies rely too heavily on AI without fact-checking or reviewing the content before publishing.

AI should support expertise, not replace it.

every piece needs human review, factual accuracy, and a clear understanding of the topic to deliver real SEO value.
 
Back
Top