Aka never share anything useful here?

I doubt very much a small fish like me could influence Google's processes.
Of course they read. They crawl the whole internet. Not just google
But for decades Google do just little enough to say we are trying to prevent this.
Some examples:
For years a rumor has been circulating about Adsense that accounts were deliberately closed just before payout so that Google could keep the accumulated balance. There is no hard evidence: the source was an anonymous post from 2014, and the class action lawsuit that followed ended in a settlement without admission of liability. But thats exactly the point. Google has never credibly refuted this, has never provided figures on when accounts are closed within the payment cycle, and the incentive is obvious: an account you close on day 29 costs nothing, while an account you close on day 2 requires a payout. A company that truly wants to show it does not do this would publish that breakdown. The fact that they dont says more than the 2014 post ever could.
There are thousands of fake ai reporter / news channels monetized on Youtube. Clearly fake news and they do less to nothing. Some with millions of views and all monitzed. This has nothing to do with cloaking because they host the videos. And when they delete it, there is no warning to people that watch it before. If you take X, there you get a notification that they deleted a AI reporter video which you bookmarked before or something, Google/Youtube can do the same but its just not in there favor. They have more power then they show. Same with streaming market. Some smaller streaming platforms successfully bans VPNs while the big ones dont because they know they can get away with it. You see exactly the same happening with Audio Books and Ebooks platforms. Most only cares when they see that you pay a lower subscription fee (netflix for example). And for ads, zeropark is far more harder to run cloaking ads as Google. Because they are smarter or are more powerfull? I guess not. So the difference lies not in the technology but in vulnerability. Zeropark could lose its payment processors or publishers due to a single media scandal and therefore has to be strict, whereas no one can shut down Google, so Google enforces rules only to the extent necessary to keep up appearances.
Take chrome for example. For years, Google denied that browser data influenced search results in the US antitrust case, Navboost revealed that click and interaction data, including some from Chrome, are, in fact, a ranking signal. That same data would expose cloaking almost immediately. Chrome sees what the user sees, and all you have to do is compare that to the crawler version. The fact that cloaking still works in Google ads speaks volumes: the data is used where it generates revenue and not where it cost revenue. Moreover enforcing rules based on chrome would openly confirm just how much Google sees. So it remains a case of saying one thing and doing another.
Just have a look at Google ads transparency center. You will find things similar to a cleaning company that runs on high scale anti virus ads. Just search some ads there in blackhat/grey niche or whitehat niche with cloaking ads such as anti virus, vpn etc and you will see enough examples. Think this is not a secret that a reveal here for them.
Or else, try to watch a demonetized channel on Youtube as guest. Guess what you see... 100% profit for Google.