Yes, SRSLTID parameters are likely session-related tracking parameters—check your canonical tags, block them in Google Search Console, and monitor for indexing issues.
Thank you so much for the info. While I was researching earlier today, most sources said that it did not affect SEO negatively. I have read the blog posts that you have added and I am still not sure. What would you suggest? Just letting it be or disabling auto tagging and adding canonicals
Set the canonical tags independently of your case,
Since SRSLTID is a tracking parameter, it does not mean that the canonical URLs are compromised if you see this tag in the SERPs.
do not modify the srsltid parameter in case your canonical links point to your clean URL. Just check your canonicals, sitemap, nd google search console to be sure that google takes the right URL.
i think better is to leave auto-tagging on if you actually use the Merchant Center tracking. if the parameter version shows the same page and the canonical points back to the clean URL, i wouldn’t try to fight every srsltid URL
I will just ignore srsltid nd check canonicals nd GSC. In case of canonical URLs, there is generally not too much to be concerned about.
the srsltid variable isn't doing anything to affect ranking as far as I know, but I would leave it alone nd monitor canonical nd GSC nd see if the clean URLs index.
to be honest, I would just ignore srsltid nd focus on clean canonicals, GSC, indexing if the clean URLs are getting picked up, then there is not much to worry about
honestly, I would skip SRSLTID completely nd begin by verifying the canonicals and GSC. In case the clean URL are indexed properly, I would not waste time on tracking parameters.
