- Aug 13, 2024
- 536
- 31
google has improved a lot at ignoring spammy backlinks. in most cases, negative seo isn t as effective as it once was, and strong websites are usually not affected by random toxic links
Recently, GSC reported tons of links to my main money page on my site. All the url slugs indicated they came from porn sites. Every link was an exact match money keyword that my page was targeting. I only lately noticed these but they've been happening for at least 6 months. That coincides with a 90% drop in impressions for that keyword. Coincidence? I think not. Correlation does not mean causation. I am surprised by almost everyone saying stuff like "Google is much better at filtering out spammy links now than previously". That is what Google wants you to believe. The reality I think is different.eping an eye on your backlink profile is still a good practice. Would be interesting to hear from anyone who has actually seen rankings drop because of a negative SEO attack recently.
Recently, GSC reported tons of links to my main money page on my site. All the url slugs indicated they came from porn sites. Every link was an exact match money keyword that my page was targeting. I only lately noticed these but they've been happening for at least 6 months. That coincides with a 90% drop in impressions for that keyword. Coincidence? I think not. Correlation does not mean causation. I am surprised by almost everyone saying stuff like "Google is much better at filtering out spammy links now than previously". That is what Google wants you to believe. The reality I think is different.
In my experience, Negative SEO is not as effective as it once was, Ranking drops are usually caused by technical problems, content quality, or algorithm updates rather than spam backlink's alone.I have been seeing mixed opinions about negative SEO lately. some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.
what's your experience does negative SEO still pose a real thread today
In my experience Google ignores most low quality spam links but a sudden wave of manipulative signals is still worth keeping an eye on.I have been seeing mixed opinions about negative SEO lately. some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.
what's your experience does negative SEO still pose a real thread today
I think the impact of negative SEO also depends on how dependent your rankings are on a small number of links. If most of your authority comes from just a handful of backlinks, losing even a few of them can be noticeable. Sites with a broader, more diverse link profile tend to be much more resilient because no single link carries too much weight. That's one reason I prefer earning links from different sources over relying heavily on one strategy.
Yes ,negative SEO may still harm competitors effectively.I have been seeing mixed opinions about negative SEO lately. some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.
what's your experience does negative SEO still pose a real thread today
I Think negative SEO is harder to pull off than it used to be, Especially with random spammy backlink's. That said, I Wouldn’t ignore it completely, particularly if there are unusual link spikes or other suspicious activity.I have been seeing mixed opinions about negative SEO lately. some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.
what's your experience does negative SEO still pose a real thread today
I Think random spam links are mostly ignored these days, but I wouldn’t say negative SEO is completely dead, Large or unusual links patterns are still worth monitoring, especially on competitive sites.I have been seeing mixed opinions about negative SEO lately. some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.
what's your experience does negative SEO still pose a real thread today
I’ve seen negative SEO still have an impact, but it’s much harder to hurt a well-established site with spammy backlinks alone. Google is generally better at ignoring obvious link spam.I have been seeing mixed opinions about negative SEO lately. some say google is much better now at ignoring spammy or toxic backlinks ,while others believe it can still cause ranking drops if done at scale.
what's your experience does negative SEO still pose a real thread today