Recent content by vishwaseduonix

  1. V

    Are we using keyword research tools wrong in 2026?

    This is very similar to what most of the folks here are doing. For me, the interesting part is what comes between saying "this topic has promise" and writing the piece. What would be your criteria to reject a topic based on your analysis of Trends and the SERP even when the keyword has fair...
  2. V

    Are we using keyword research tools wrong in 2026?

    That's a good point, I think, and one that is probably really useful for distinguishing between keywords of different search intent. This is where, actually, I think the "search volume" can mislead most of all, because two queries can have a similar number of searches, but offer vastly different...
  3. V

    Are we using keyword research tools wrong in 2026?

    That's very close to what I'm doing myself, but looking into discussions to actually validate topics before going after them The thing with "threads first" I'm curious to understand is what are you finding in the discussions that SERPs aren't telling you For example, are you using...
  4. V

    Are we using keyword research tools wrong in 2026?

    This is probably one of the most crucial aspects that I’ve changed. While KD highlights potential difficulties with the link profile, it says little about whether the SERP actually satisfies the query. How far are you willing to go when researching keywords? Are you looking for easy competition...
  5. V

    Are we using keyword research tools wrong in 2026?

    Agreed. I think we've all learned by now that the search volume isn't an absolute metric, but I think we're in the camp to say that the opportunity is a much better indicator than the search volume. A keyword with 20k searches may not be a good opportunity if the SERP is all branded queries...
  6. V

    Are we using keyword research tools wrong in 2026?

    I like the workflow, especially having the competition check last instead of KD deciding what to publish. But there’s one piece I’m curious about: does Google Trends actually tell us the future, or does it just tell us that something is already starting to happen? There can be a pretty big gap...
  7. V

    Are we using keyword research tools wrong in 2026?

    Interesting point of view. I think the "site-specific correction factor" makes more sense than treating a 5K search volume estimate as a universal number for every site. I'm curious about how you actually put it into practice tho. Are you comparing the tool's estimated volume against total GSC...
  8. V

    Are we using keyword research tools wrong in 2026?

    Precisely. I think the hard part is realizing demand is growing before everyone else starts chasing it. Google trends can show the direction but I don’t think it’s always enough by itself. Sometimes a topic looks like it’s taking off, but there’s just not a lot of meaningful search intent...
  9. V

    Are we using keyword research tools wrong in 2026?

    That's pretty much where I am too. Ahrefs is good for the opportunity, but once Google starts showing a page impressions, GSC feels like the more interesting dataset because you’re seeing the actual queries Google is associating with the page. I'm still trying to figure out when you make that...
  10. V

    Are we using keyword research tools wrong in 2026?

    I’ve been thinking about this, looking at how I normally plan blog content. It appears the usual process is: Ahrefs / Semrush → find a keyword → check search volume → check KD → check the competitors → write the article. But I’m beginning to wonder if we’re putting too much stock in the first...
  11. V

    Are We Building Links for Rankings Now or AI Visibility?

    The "same links, two jobs" part is probably the most interesting here. I agree, I don't think you'd separate out AI visibility from traditional SEO as if they're completely separate systems. If a page isn’t indexed, discoverable and already showing some level of authority, there’s not much for...
  12. V

    Are We Building Links for Rankings Now or AI Visibility?

    That's a really good distinction. I think “what page gets the link” is becoming just as important as “what domain gets the link.” The commercial page may have the authority, but it’s the useful, question-driven page that generally gets the visibility, gets cited, and maybe becomes the source...
  13. V

    Are We Building Links for Rankings Now or AI Visibility?

    Yep, that's right where I'm headed as well. DR can show you how strong a domain looks on paper, but traffic, relevance, and real mentions can tell you so much more about whether the site actually has influence. What’s interesting is whether these signals are becoming useful not just for...
  14. V

    Are We Building Links for Rankings Now or AI Visibility?

    Something I've been pondering recently. For years, the link-building discussion has basically revolved around the same things: DA / DR, topical relevance, ref domains, anchor text, guest posts, niche edits, PBNs, etc. But search is changing pretty fast. Google no longer just gives us a list...
Back
Top