What the heck. All the is the same silly stuff most people do and it doesn't work well. I mean don't get me wrong it is nothing wrong with getting links from forums, web 2.0 and so on, but most people just don't do it right. Details are very important. Details will make the difference between...
I don't but depending on how smart you want it to be it can be very easy. A freelancer can do it starting from $20 or so. By 'smart' I mean should it try to leave flash cookies, do visitor system footprinting, etc. If you just want to track them by IP and/or a regular cookie then it is trivial -...
What you are doing is multi-level spinning.
"and 3 words per sentence I pick synonyms" - if you mean that you pick synonyms for just 3 words in each sentence (instead of all words) I recommend against that. Do all words/expressions it is worth the time.
Based on my tests, you generate...
I have yet to find a single public link network that is undetectable. I doubt what you say because in order to stay undetectable they would have to know how they get detected and I doubt they know that. I have a pretty good algorithm for detecting most sites in a link network. I don't even need...
You're basing what you say on what? Because I am basing what I say on actual tests. I didn't expected it either but that's how it is. You CAN generate over 1000 articles from same spintax and they will all stay around 40% unique just like if you would generate just 20 articles. It's actually a...
Yes that would work. Also, do not think that just because you build a 2nd link from same source its value is low. I would say you can easily build 10-20 links from same source without a significant decrease in value. After 100 links you would obviously get less and less value from each...
If I would write by hand the content I use for my links nets I would grow old and die by the time I make any serious cash. I obviously use hand written content on most important site but on the rest I just use manually spun multi-level content. Even that is a pain to do. I have 4 guys who do...
For proxies i use Proxy Goblin and also scrape from custom sources. Never ever needed private proxies. They are obviously slow thought, unlike the private ones.
well put togheter guide. i agree with almost everything in it. what i particularly don't like is the 100k links in one go :) I'd never do that, not even with an old domain. If you had 10 links/mo for the past year and now you spike to 100k in a day does that look common to you?
Yes it is possible. You need the database (free one is good) from ip2location or the Apache geolocation module. You build a script to detect visitor location and based on that you redirect to other site or show him a different product or page. Just google "detect visitor country" or something...
I usually build my mini-empires in reverse - in other words i start with the support sites. So yeah, go ahead and build some web 2.0 and build some links to them.
"level the playing field" - i will believe that when i will stop seeing wikipedia ranking first for any term , or the algorithm won't be based on domain trust. Put the worst unreadable content on NY times, wikipedia, BBC, CNET, etc. and see how well it ranks. I find myself using advanced search...
You have to use spun content. MANUALLY spun! Here's the kicker:
If you spin on one single level (just words) you can generate over 1000 articles from one spintax, however the uniqueness will be around 40% only. Even if you generate just 20 articles uniquenes is still just 40%. In order to...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.