It makes sense to me since it's fairly common for sites to use all kinds of redirects. 301, 302, and meta-refresh are all fairly common. However, since they also all have their intended use cases, maybe the algorithms are smart enough to determine the actual context of the link.
Screw those guy's Don! They wouldn't ask you to pay anything for a real sponsorship. In fact, they'd be paying you in addition to dropping off boxes of cloths on your doorstep.
I've dropped just under $1,500 on services here on BHW in the last few months (since November, 2017). In many cases I'm targeting multiple tiers that I've built on my own. Because of all that, it is incredibly hard for me to attribute movement to any one service. Because there is so much...
All of my reviews are legit. Though I understand that having some reviews incentivized makes them vulnerable to slant. I always try to provide valuable feedback for the other users of BHW and so providers can take note and improve their services. I do not provide ranking improvements in my...
Sounds a bit like you're mixing concerns or jumping the gun on things, not sure which. In one breath you're saying google changed something, on the other you're saying you changed something. How do you know which change had an effect or which effect each change had? In my opinion you are better...
Something is being returned, likely already a 404. It could take a while for a 404 that was once a 200 to go away. You might have better luck with 410 but I remove them in webmaster tool. I get that it's a PBN so this isn't likely an option. So just make sure it's returning a 404 or 410 now...
I've been working with a parasite that is:
a) a subdomain site
b) outgoing links are 302 redirects
how much of an impact do the redirects have vs direct links?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.