Tool/service restoring websites way back machine

[waltersweb]

Hi guys,

Can anyone recommend either tools or services to recreate websites which are in the wayback machine (archive.org)?

It would be great if it wouldn't automatically restore only the latest version but let's you choose which one to restore?

Thanks!

 

[blogzandstuff]

Have you tried waybackmachinedownloader?

 

[3bisu]

There is a service/tool in the marketplace, check it out

 

[BassTrackerBoats]

There is a service/tool in the marketplace, check it out

Here it is - https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/domrecovery-resurrect-websites-from-wayback-machine.842968/

 

[waltersweb]

Thanks guys! I will take a look at that

 

[jimbobo2779]

Here it is - https://www.blackhatworld.com/seo/domrecovery-resurrect-websites-from-wayback-machine.842968/

Thanks for the shout out. Appreciate it.

 

[MikeyMikey13]

waybackrebuilder.com is far better than any i've seen on this forum/elsewhere. You get unlimited restores for a month, 30$.

The last few sites I did were perfect.

 

[jimbobo2779]

waybackrebuilder.com is far better than any i've seen on this forum/elsewhere. You get unlimited restores for a month, 30$.

The last few sites I did were perfect.

I am genuinely asking here but how do you feel it improves on DomRecovery? I have not seen any websites not recovered perfectly with DR and it is a one time cost of $67 for BHW members.

 

[MikeyMikey13]

I am genuinely asking here but how do you feel it improves on DomRecovery? I have not seen any websites not recovered perfectly with DR and it is a one time cost of $67 for BHW members.

I've never been disappointed with WBR. Again, all the sites I've had have been perfect. Very consistent.

The tool allows you to view how the site would look before you start your download, then it takes roughly 5 minutes to get a link to your files.

Edit, the reason I like those guys is just because of the preview function. I am unsure if your software has similar features.

 

[jimbobo2779]

I've never been disappointed with WBR. Again, all the sites I've had have been perfect. Very consistent.

The tool allows you to view how the site would look before you start your download, then it takes roughly 5 minutes to get a link to your files.

Edit, the reason I like those guys is just because of the preview function. I am unsure if your software has similar features.

To be honest I never really thought a preview function would be necessary as the end result is how it would look on the Wayback Machine and it would only ever take 5 minutes to recover a relatively large website, in fact most are completed in seconds.

Thanks for clarifying though, sometimes when I ask questions like that people think I am insinuating something I am not.

Cheers

 

[MikeyMikey13]

To be honest I never really thought a preview function would be necessary as the end result is how it would look on the Wayback Machine and it would only ever take 5 minutes to recover a relatively large website, in fact most are completed in seconds.

Thanks for clarifying though, sometimes when I ask questions like that people think I am insinuating something I am not.

Cheers

No problem, always good getting some market research from potential customers.

One thing I would also add about the preview function, you can use that instead of checking the archive. For me I scrape alot of sites, so when I am rebuilding I like to just use the preview feature. So instead of finding the version you want on archive.org, then putting it into the rebuilder, you just put the URL in and search the previews for the one you want.